I think Stanford and GT BOTH have challenges 95% of other schools in P5 don't have to deal with. The difference between GT and Stanford, and I've said this MANY times, is Stanford's challenges are on the front end (getting kids accepted into school) while GT's challenges are more on the back end (keeping them APR eligible). I did some research a while and found that the lowest GPA Stanford accepted from a recruit was 3.3 GPA (after scouring available GPA data recruits provided). That recruit was Christian McCaffery btw. While I found GT accepted a recruit with a 2.9 GPA. Stanford's HC David Shaw (and this may be an extension of the school telling coaches that's what they want) requires his kids to have 2 AP classes on their transcript when they apply. I've never found GT to have that standard.
So it's a bit of the chicken or the egg conundrum here. Is it better to have it harder on the front end but easier to keep kids in school. I think this makes Stanford's pool a lot smaller than GT's.
Is it harder to try and keep kids APR eligible at a school with limited and harder majors, but have lower requirements for recruits? Our pool is larger than Stanford's because of this. Remember, we got Louis Young and St Amour because both were waiting on Stanford to accept them, but neither got accepted and chose us afterwards.
I think both schools have very real limitations that set us apart from the rest of P5. It's just a matter of opinion as to which you think is the harder route.