mstranahan
Helluva Engineer
- Messages
- 1,561
I wonder if White has to step out of the room when FL is talked about since that is his son.
Not sure if he has to by rule, but I'm sure he will
I wonder if White has to step out of the room when FL is talked about since that is his son.
Not sure if he has to by rule, but I'm sure he will
GT fans, we need to pull hard for Duke tomorrow.
I don't see in a million years that Clemson gets into the tournament. They're in 12th place in the ACC. They are 0-7 against top 25 teams and in fact have not won a single solitary game against a ranked team in 10 years. TEN YEARS. Their RPI is > 50. If all you can finish ahead of is Boston College, coach-less NC State, and Pittsburgh, that's poor. They haven't beaten a single ACC team in the top half, much less a ranked one. They finish @ Miami, @ Virginia Tech, Florida State, NC State, and Boston College. They will likely be 4-12 in the conference, 14-14 overall heading into their last 2 games. If they screw 1 of those up, they won't even make the NIT. They are horrible and aren't getting in.
They started off 11-2 playing the usual non-conference schedule. They have since gone 3-9. The committee weights what you do the second half of the season more than the first. Its why they will keep not getting into the tournament.
Miami, yes. Otherwise, no. Not ever.GT fans, we need to pull hard for Miami and Duke tomorrow.
ESPN has updated their bubble watch. Don't have any disagreements with it.
Also gives a pretty good explanation of why so many mediocre P5 teams are looking to get bids - short answer, the mid majors are pretty weak this year so they simply don't have teams to steal bids.
http://www.espn.com/mens-college-basketball/bubblewatch
I've said 4-2 and still think that, but i'm starting to think 3-3 with a 1st round ACC win might be enough - that would depend upon what happens elsewhere, but alot of the conferences are starting to settle down. Big10 is likely to get 7 unless IND gets hot. Pac12 is looking at 4-5, Utah is out without a big run. SEC is looking at 4 unless someone goes on a big run. Big East probably gets 5.
Sunday's game is vitally important.
Miami, yes. Otherwise, no. Not ever.
Doesn't it feel like we've heard "the bubble is weak" for the last 5-8 years now? I wonder if it's just a product of the expanded field and parity. It feels like the new norm that you can be severely flawed with a couple good wins and have a compelling case.
This is very interesting. One thing, in particular, caught my eye. A road win does not count more than a home win in the RPI rankings.
https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-ncaa-is-modernizing-the-way-it-picks-march-madness-teams/
Good point. P6 description aside, feels like the "bubble is weak" all the time. I can't remember a time recently when someone stated it's looking strong.That is kind of the description of a bubble team from a power conference. The difference is that the leagues just below the 6 majors that usually have 4 or 5 reasonable candidates (American, Mountain West, A-10) do not have any depth this year. The Mountain West in particular is like a low major this year, with only the champion likely to sniff the tournament.