takethepoints
Helluva Engineer
- Messages
- 6,146
I have to say that I think we will suffer on O at first due to inexperience at WR and BB. We had really good performers at both positions (and, if we hadn't needed Laskey to field punts when he was a frosh, we would still have one) but I don't see any way that the replacements are as good right off the bat. The tale of the tape will be after a couple of games. We need to have good performances from these positions – not great ones, just good – by the time we go up to South Bend, imho. Otherwise everyone on the schedule will be laying for JT to run. He was as effective as he was last year because we had such good performance from our BBs and WRs.
I don't know if we'll be alright at these positions or not. The talent is there, but, except for Skov and Summers, it has virtually no game experience. I hope I'm being pessimistic and that someone will step up at BB, at least. We can do without a great WR, but we need a reliable 3 - 4 yards on the dive for things to work. And, no, I don't think we will be as good in the middle of the OL next year either. We need a BB to emerge from the woodwork this fall.
I don't know if we'll be alright at these positions or not. The talent is there, but, except for Skov and Summers, it has virtually no game experience. I hope I'm being pessimistic and that someone will step up at BB, at least. We can do without a great WR, but we need a reliable 3 - 4 yards on the dive for things to work. And, no, I don't think we will be as good in the middle of the OL next year either. We need a BB to emerge from the woodwork this fall.