Portal Watch 2022-23

Richard7125

Jolly Good Fellow
Messages
466
jojatk said:
So what happens when a young man has eligibility remaining, has graduated, either wants to go to grad school elsewhere or wasn't accepted at his current school, AND wants more playing time and more NIL? Do we need yet another word for that? ;)

The motivation really isn't accounted for by the terms used. In all cases the student-athlete is "transferring" his/her remaining eligibility to another school. I think, though I'm not certain, we have a specific term for when that student-athlete has actually earned his/her degree (graduate transfer) because it used to be one of the only ways you would be immediately eligible to play even if you transferred to another school of the same level.
Click to expand...
I wasn’t specifically criticizing you on saying transferring. This is more about the overall use of the word equating someone who graduates with someone who transfers after his freshman year. Yes, both are transferring their remaining athletic eligibility, but these are massively different scenarios and way too many people look at them as the same thing.
 
orientalnc

orientalnc

Helluva Engineer
Retired Staff
Messages
10,051
Location
Oriental, NC
Richard7125 said:
I wasn’t specifically criticizing you on saying transferring. This is more about the overall use of the word equating someone who graduates with someone who transfers after his freshman year. Yes, both are transferring their remaining athletic eligibility, but these are massively different scenarios and way too many people look at them as the same thing.
Click to expand...
I guess I don't understand why it matters. The term "transfer" in this case only really applies to athletic eligibility, but in reality athletes with and without degrees are transferring to another school. Granted, the registrar at the new school treats the two cases differently, but the athletic departments do not. I doubt anyone on The Swarm would complain if you used the term "graduate transfer" when appropriate. For me, and perhaps others, both are OK.
 
jojatk

jojatk

Helluva Engineer
Messages
1,624
Richard7125 said:
I wasn’t specifically criticizing you on saying transferring. This is more about the overall use of the word equating someone who graduates with someone who transfers after his freshman year. Yes, both are transferring their remaining athletic eligibility, but these are massively different scenarios and way too many people look at them as the same thing.
Click to expand...
Got it. Thank you. I totally misunderstood where you were coming from and I greatly appreciate the clarification.
 
roadkill

roadkill

Helluva Engineer
Messages
1,931
orientalnc said:
I guess I don't understand why it matters. The term "transfer" in this case only really applies to athletic eligibility, but in reality athletes with and without degrees are transferring to another school. Granted, the registrar at the new school treats the two cases differently, but the athletic departments do not. I doubt anyone on The Swarm would complain if you used the term "graduate transfer" when appropriate. For me, and perhaps others, both are OK.
Click to expand...
The difference, to me at least, is that an outbound undergrad transfer strongly implies that the S-A is looking for greener pastures at another school. It could be a case of dissatisfaction with playing time, dissatisfaction with coaches, grades, NIL, or some other reason to seek a change in their environment. Conversely, an outbound grad transfer, particularly of an S-A that has stuck with the school and earned a degree, implies that a loyal S-A may not have the opportunity to finish their eligibility there due to factors beyond their control. Of course, this is somewhat speculative but that’s my perspective.
 
orientalnc

orientalnc

Helluva Engineer
Retired Staff
Messages
10,051
Location
Oriental, NC
roadkill said:
The difference, to me at least, is that an outbound undergrad transfer strongly implies that the S-A is looking for greener pastures at another school. It could be a case of dissatisfaction with playing time, dissatisfaction with coaches, grades, NIL, or some other reason to seek a change in their environment. Conversely, an outbound grad transfer, particularly of an S-A that has stuck with the school and earned a degree, implies that a loyal S-A may not have the opportunity to finish their eligibility there due to factors beyond their control. Of course, this is somewhat speculative but that’s my perspective.
Click to expand...
I agree with you, but the terms used by the NCAA are about as meaningless to me as much what they do.
 
Northeast Stinger

Northeast Stinger

Helluva Engineer
Messages
11,184
roadkill said:
The difference, to me at least, is that an outbound undergrad transfer strongly implies that the S-A is looking for greener pastures at another school. It could be a case of dissatisfaction with playing time, dissatisfaction with coaches, grades, NIL, or some other reason to seek a change in their environment. Conversely, an outbound grad transfer, particularly of an S-A that has stuck with the school and earned a degree, implies that a loyal S-A may not have the opportunity to finish their eligibility there due to factors beyond their control. Of course, this is somewhat speculative but that’s my perspective.
Click to expand...
Yes, helpful distinction. The only reason we are interested in transfers is because of what they might tell us about whether or not they are strengthening or weakening a program in the process of transferring. Assessing the degree to which a player is disgruntled, or gold digging, or making smart life decisions is important information.
 
BurdellJacket

BurdellJacket

Ramblin' Wreck
Messages
514
Location
Atlanta
This may have already been answered within these 66 pages and I missed it, but can anyone please post a link to a list of the outbound/inbound transfers for each school? It would be interesting to see which teams had the most and the least transfers. Last I saw Texas A&M had 22 transferring out. That must be one of the highest.
 
orientalnc

orientalnc

Helluva Engineer
Retired Staff
Messages
10,051
Location
Oriental, NC
BurdellJacket said:
This may have already been answered within these 66 pages and I missed it, but can anyone please post a link to a list of the outbound/inbound transfers for each school? It would be interesting to see which teams had the most and the least transfers. Last I saw Texas A&M had 22 transferring out. That must be one of the highest.
Click to expand...
247sports.com

2023 College Football Transfer Portal

2023 College Football Transfer Portal
247sports.com 247sports.com
 
roadkill

roadkill

Helluva Engineer
Messages
1,931
orientalnc said:
I agree with you, but the terms used by the NCAA are about as meaningless to me as much what they do.
Click to expand...
Until recently (this year perhaps), there was an important distinction in NCAA eligibility rules between undergrad and grad transfers. So the removal of the sit-out-a-year requirement for undergrads has, in my opinion, muddied the waters on how we view transfers.
 
slugboy

slugboy

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
11,727
MWBATL said:
Gracious...some programs have enormous turnover. Colorado has 23 incoming commits, and Arizona State has 26!!! Our number (11) seems average or perhaps even below average.
Click to expand...
Arizona State was rated about where we were for 2022, and Colorado was a lot worse. Arizona State brought in Dillingham from Oregon, and Colorado brought in Sanders. Both are outsiders, and Sanders was pretty clear that he was cleaning house.

For a coach that came in championed by his players, I think Key has brought in a lot of freshmen and transfers. Not as many as some other schools, but plenty compared to the number of graduating players. Everyone is gonna have to fight for their positions.
 
iceeater1969

iceeater1969

Helluva Engineer
Messages
9,789
slugboy said:
Arizona State was rated about where we were for 2022, and Colorado was a lot worse. Arizona State brought in Dillingham from Oregon, and Colorado brought in Sanders. Both are outsiders, and Sanders was pretty clear that he was cleaning house.

For a coach that came in championed by his players, I think Key has brought in a lot of freshmen and transfers. Not as many as some other schools, but plenty compared to the number of graduating players. Everyone is gonna have to fight for their positions.
Click to expand...
Dont forget that junior senior credits at many schools don't transfer to gt.
 
Augusta_Jacket

Augusta_Jacket

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
8,125
Location
Augusta, Georgia
Mattmc10 said:
I’m guessing this is wrong but that site says Walton has 2 more years. That can’t be possible, right?
Click to expand...

It's wrong. He has one year left. FWIW, the official GT site hasn't updated the bios on everyone to include 2022 so it's possible someone doing a quick check confused the last entry being 2021's redshirt sophomore year as having two years of eligibility left.
 
Top