OK if the rule was in place how the hell didn’t GT’s staff know about it before the game. Did we just wake up & realize after the fact our play could never have worked because the defense is allowed to mug receivers on 4th down?It makes sense if you think about it for a second. Those outside guys on punts are looking to get blocked, and I’m guessing the rule exists for a good reason if you go look at history.
OK if the rule was in place how the hell didn’t GT’s staff know about it before the game. Did we just wake up & realize after the fact our play could never have worked because the defense is allowed to mug receivers on 4th down?
Secondly, who determines if the player receiving the snap on 4th down is a punter or a quarterback?
Back shoulder throw or not the ruling on the field was there’s no PI on 4th down. It could have been a perfect throw & all the defender has to do is tackle the receiver before the pass gets there. This play has ZERO chance of being successful unless the WR has mre than 20 yds between him and a defender and with that much buffer it’s probably still a very low probability play because the defender can just tackle the receiver without any concern about being flagged for anything.They knew the rule. The play was supposed to be a back shoulder throw. The play wasn’t executed well.
Back shoulder throw or not the ruling on the field was there’s no PI on 4th down. It could have been a perfect throw & all the defender has to do is tackle the receiver before the pass gets there. This play has ZERO chance of being successful unless the WR has mre than 20 yds between him and a defender and with that much buffer it’s probably still a very low probability play because the defender can just tackle the receiver without any concern about being flagged for anything.
They knew the rule. The play was supposed to be a back shoulder throw. The play wasn’t executed well.
This season reminds me a lot of the 1996 seasonand that folks is a perfect summation of our losses...
"The play wasn’t executed well"
Our players have excellent academic entrance standards I find these kinds of errors disturbing. .and that folks is a perfect summation of our losses...
"The play wasn’t executed well"
Like i said in the chat, it may not have been PI, but it damn sure was holding
I has never heard the rule that there can be no PI on fake punts. That seems like a crazy loophole. As a defender you should tackle any receivers near you on a fake. It’s legal!
Our players have excellent academic entrance standards I find these kinds of errors disturbing. .
Actually hate to see us waste a play like that in a hopelessly bad situation
The zebra said WTTE there could not be a penalty on a receiver if it looked like we were going to punt. Call it what you want, but if I were a special teams coach I’d tackle everyone firing off the line on a punt if they were an eligible receiver & I’d cite this BS rule if it even exists.Thank you!!!!!!!
It's been driving me nuts thstvno one else seems to get this.
Like i said in the chat, it may not have been PI, but it damn sure was holding
The zebra said WTTE there could not be a penalty on a receiver if it looked like we were going to punt. Call it what you want, but if I were a special teams coach I’d tackle everyone firing off the line on a punt if they were an eligible receiver & I’d cite this BS rule if it even exists.