Root4GT
Helluva Engineer
- Messages
- 3,064
So we would gave 3 home games that the opposing fans out number our fans. No thanks.We should have asked for Clemp and Free Shoes every year. Best chance of having 2 decent turnouts home and away.
So we would gave 3 home games that the opposing fans out number our fans. No thanks.We should have asked for Clemp and Free Shoes every year. Best chance of having 2 decent turnouts home and away.
You have to win to be a rival. We are currently not a rival to Clemson. That needs to change.We’ve played them every year for over 4 decades I believe and they have been a rival for longer. I think we still lead the series by a good margin but I haven’t checked.
I’m trying to imagine uga giving up playing Florida or Auburn and I just can’t imagine it. Rivals build interest over generations of fandom.
Let’s see them do that to a Tobacco Road school and watch how quickly it would get changed back to actual home games….actually, they would never take their two best home games and make them neutral sites, especially not putting one on a different continent. I know we love to hate on the ACC, but I’m really glad they have had to realign conference schedules repeatedly over the past few years. It has given us multiple reminders of where we stand in the conference. If another offer comes around, all we would really need to do is look at what they have done to us these past three years and the decision becomes quite easy to make.Taking our 2 best home games away from our actual stadium should be a criminal offence
Pretty sure the ACC had absolutely nothing to do with us playing FSU in Ireland or Notre Dame in MBS. Both of those were GT decisions and the ACC was not involved. The ACC has shafted Tech in different ways before, but neither of those 2 games are reasons to be disgruntled with the conference.Let’s see them do that to a Tobacco Road school and watch how quickly it would get changed back to actual home games….actually, they would never take their two best home games and make them neutral sites, especially not putting one on a different continent. I know we love to hate on the ACC, but I’m really glad they have had to realign conference schedules repeatedly over the past few years. It has given us multiple reminders of where we stand in the conference. If another offer comes around, all we would really need to do is look at what they have done to us these past three years and the decision becomes quite easy to make.
My personal opinion on no permanent rivals is that I just don't care. What I mean by that is that I don't care about any specific teams in the ACC. None of them mean anything to me anymore. I used to feel very differently but lately I've just stopped caring much who we play. I want to see us play a competitive schedule so when I say I don't care it doesn't mean I want us to play a ton of patsies. I just mean that Clemson doesn't mean that much to me other than "good football team up the road that wears orange and has a tiger paw on their helmets" and if there's another team we play instead of them that's fine with me.
I guess I've just gotten used to change being the only constant. I don't know if that's good or bad. It just is, for me. But I respect the opinions of those who do care and I'm sorry that we don't have the permanent rivals that DO mean something to you.
Pitt has been in the ACC since 2013 and 2028 will be the first road game for Wake vs. Pitt.
15 years to play a conference member home and home. What a league.
I would like to play ND every year in the Benz. And that be our only constant rival. Win.win for both teams and the Benz.Are we finally done with the Benz after ND?
When was the last time we had majority of our fans at home games with these two? would be a different mind set when we rebuild the GT fan baseWe should have asked for Clemp and Free Shoes every year. Best chance of having 2 decent turnouts home and away.
You may not feel we are rivals but lots of Tech fans would disagree.You have to win to be a rival. We are currently not a rival to Clemson. That needs to change.
Do we know that? I'm really just talking about Clemson. Did they not ask, or did they ask, and we said, "no"? Or did we ask, and they said, "no"? What specifically do we know about this process?Also, Clemson, UNC, UVA, and a bunch of other schools didn’t ask for us.
Those aren't the same people complaining. Some even want to drop Ugag.So we complain about how hard our schedule is with Clempson on it every year. Then we complain that we won't be playing them every year. Got it.
Trading their fans for empty seats is not a good plan. When we build our fan base, we can trade them for our fans then.When was the last time we had majority of our fans at home games with these two? would be a different mind set when we rebuild the GT fan base
Exactly.Those aren't the same people complaining. Some even want to drop Ugag.
Change is inevitable, and that's fine. "The more things change, the more they stay the same", as they say in France. But tradition is a very important part of college football, and I don't think it's wise to throw traditions, especially perennial rivalries right down the road, over so easily. We have so few of them left, and the current upheavals are destroying the few that remain.
We have now one left. If we stop playing Ugag, we'll have none.
When Tech beat uga 8 games in a row there were zero uga fans asking to drop the series. Neither did they complain about Tech fans taking over a stadium, ours or theirs.Trading their fans for empty seats is not a good plan. When we build our fan base, we can trade them for our fans then.