Don't have a clue really, but comparing the two offenses (Baylor-GT) seems to me like comparing calculus to arithmetic: the only similarity is that both use numbers.
Not the calculus I had to take...
If the "war" concept applies here and holds true, then these guys who've stuck it out together this year should all come together next year and rid our memories of this year's wretched experience.
As long as it is true confessions, mine is that, not being a brave soul, I never took calculus. To this day it and all its near and far flung relations might as well be alchemy.
First it is the nature of the option offense, and when the run is stuffed it doesn't necessarily mean it's a bad call, but more probably a bad read. As for running it, have you seen our guys pass the ball this year? Sometimes it has been Reggie Ball 2.0.
That's a big "oops" moment for the trigger happy offense and play call critics.
Well. Where to start? To keep it short: almost everybody runs the option now, most from the shotgun, though Johnson and others have explained the under-center rationale, which seems fine to everybody except when it isn't. So I won't go there again. I have said before, and here again: Johnson makes $3 million a year and can take care of himself; I'm not his watcher. I just have this odd view that he knows more about offensive football and defensive tendencies than we do, else we would be there making his $3 million and he would be engineering something. (And in my experience I have found engineers a breed of linear thinkers, but then I don't know many engineers.) Of course passing is partly a function of blocking, though I am a function-before-form guy, and when Abacks and WRs can't get create space, it makes no difference whether the QB starts off six yards deep or under center ... he is looking for a hidey-hole instantly. And I suppose JacketFromGeorgia might observe that when the pass fails nobody says it was a bad call. Oh, wait. He already did.
Just stop already with your fact-based posts.
