Buzzforlife
Jolly Good Fellow
- Messages
- 133
Personally, it bothered me somewhat during one of his previous press conferences CDS stated that he has to manipulate the players.
That is just saying the quiet part out loud. I think coaches often manipulate their players in order to get the best out of them. They just don't announce it publicly.Personally, it bothered me somewhat during one of his previous press conferences CDS stated that he has to manipulate the players.
So what exactly is the problem with a coach manipulating players into better performance? DoPersonally, it bothered me somewhat during one of his previous press conferences CDS stated that he has to manipulate the players.
Whose feelings? Yours? He shouldnāt care. His players? That may be what he intends. He could easily have said what he said after Clemson as a way of challenging this team to see who would come out fighting in the last 5 games. Let him manage and letās all see what happens.CDS probably would be well served by some PR lessons for his press conferences. I like them because he is open and honest, but he can ruffle feelings.
Coach is saying loud and clear that he demands his players play with pride, intelligence, and full effort every second of every game and of every practice. After the last game (and many games this year), it is apparent that his demand is reasonable if we are going to have a chance of winning with any level of consistency. Why are folks on a message board getting so upset about that? It seems perfectly reasonable that he say that "his guys" are going to meet that demand, cuz many of the players on the current team are certainly not. I am hopeful that they get the message and improve because that message resonates throughout all aspects of life.Whose feelings? Yours? He shouldnāt care. His players? That may be what he intends. He could easily have said what he said after Clemson as a way of challenging this team to see who would come out fighting in the last 5 games. Let him manage and letās all see what happens.
Kowacie Reeves dad, who is very active in the basketball recruiting world, remarked on twitter for potential GT recruits that CDS tells it like it is and and will give it to you straight & honest. I would bet the press, fans & public get the watered down straight talk in his pressers. Doubt very much that the players are spared or hear anything in the pressers that they are not already aware of.CDS probably would be well served by some PR lessons for his press conferences. I like them because he is open and honest, but he can ruffle feelings.
What he said was, coaching is manipulation. He used a term, 'manipulation,' that has negative connotations.Personally, it bothered me somewhat during one of his previous press conferences CDS stated that he has to manipulate the players.
Whose feelings? Yours? He shouldnāt care. His players? That may be what he intends. He could easily have said what he said after Clemson as a way of challenging this team to see who would come out fighting in the last 5 games. Let him manage and letās all see what happens.
LOLā¦nope. Sorry if I maligned you...Not mine, but there seems to be enough against expressed in the posts I read. If you read my post, I said I liked his press conferences. Did I hurt your feelings?
Good words. The players are playing high level college basketball. He is not calling anyone out by name, just telling the team that is you don't play as coached you will get your *** beat down as happened against Clemson. Ether buy into how he is coaching or you will be replaced.Whose feelings? Yours? He shouldnāt care. His players? That may be what he intends. He could easily have said what he said after Clemson as a way of challenging this team to see who would come out fighting in the last 5 games. Let him manage and letās all see what happens.
It's 100% a deflection to bring up Pastner here. You can't even pretend that CDS takes any responsibility after losses.
But since you brought it up, Pastner won ACC CotY for greatly overperforming with the group that he inherited instead of throwing them under the bus after every loss. He also had our first back to back winning conferences records in a quarter century and our first conference championship in a similar amount of time. There was at least some level of success to earn leeway in balancing the problems he had to believe he could have success in the future. Even with that I routinely criticized his stubbornness with regards to the Princeton and especially his tendency in his later years of going small ball lineups to the detriment of the development of our bigs, and even before he was fired last year I said he likely wasn't going to be the guy to fix things long term but was against firing him because we were unlikely to land someone actually better at that time (and the way things have played since then haven't done anything to prove that fear unwarranted). Just because you refuse to criticize CDS doesn't mean I was the same way with Pastner.
In contrast, CDS has never led his team to the NCAAT as a head coach. He has an overall losing record, and only one winning season as a head coach. He wasn't some long tenured NBA assistant or the secret reason the Celtics were good like people pretend. He was there a year and a half. He only spent two years coaching at the P5 level in any capacity. In short, nothing he has done as a coach warrants the absolute free pass he is being given for this year nor his complete throwing the players under the bus and taking no responsibility for his team's play.
lol. Can just imagine what the āignoredāHoly revisionist history. LOL
Holy revisionist history. LOL
I think we have good shooters on the team. I think as a team we do very little to generate good looks so a lot of our looks are longer shots, contested shots, etc that lead to lower percentage. For some reason our offense seems designed to generate tough shots at the rim for our wings and guards and does almost nothing to try and generate outside looks.
By playing one interior player we're often in line ups where only one guy has probably had much pressure to rebound before to develop those skills, and he's often at a further disadvantage because of his height.
We will. Unfortunately we've rarely, if ever, ran a line up with both of them on the court at once. Unfortunately, the way I see this year playing out is Howard will play about 10 minutes a game right until the time we absolutely can't get away with a 6-7 center. Then we'll put him in and be surprised he's struggling.
2) Can our coaching staff get away from the obsession with tiny ball experimentation.
3) Can we better utilize depth than we have so far under Pastner.
Pastner may or may not be the answer long term, with odds are that he isn't. If we fire him I would wager that his replacement, that we would get this year, likely wouldn't be either. What we do know is we need to improve our NIL competitiveness. Do that and maybe Pastner is the guy. If not we're more likely to land a coach who is. So If we have to chose just one, I'd rather fix the NIL deal first then make the coaching change, if needed, rather than forcing the coaching change now without the NIL situation in place that the better names would probably want.
Yes, if we were serious, we'd fire Pastner, and go make a big name hire. But we won't. We'll either stick with Pastner and hope he figures out the inconstancy issues, or fire him and likely land with an extraordinarily lack luster hire of a coach who will probably have accomplished less than what Pastner already has here.
These were posts i made from last year In regards to pastner.
In response to why we were strugging on offense last year.
In response to someone claiming we got outrebounded because a lack of heart.
In response to a claim that we would need Howard for defense and rebounding.
From a preseason line up discussion.
At the end of last year when diacussing if we should fire pastner.
And here is a real kicker. Odd you don't remember it because it was in response to your post and you even responded to it.
That was from last March.
You are the only one doing revisionist history.
Bud, you do this bored tiresome deal everytime. You keep your little archive of 8 posts like it's all you've said for years. And then post it like it embodies your thousands of posts. Cool archive. Doesn't remotely tell the whole story.
Sliced and diced by a well disciplined teamGeorgia Tech routed at home by Clemson
Yellow Jackets fell behind early and could never recover against the Tigers.www.ajc.com