I see lots of man defense, which of course screens and double screens can help with. But it will be interesting to see how dedicated to that they are. In other words, if you pull everyone out to the perimeter, do the defenders follow? Then you could run a lot of iso plays. I'd put some of our guys like Jose and Ush against anybody 1 on 1.
As far as I can tell, Pastner does matchup/iso in 2 or 3 ways, sort of. But we don't really run "set plays" - we are 95% continuity offenses.
1. Princeton "low" with Moses on the block for post iso. Have not seen this often, but maybe that was because ACC typically has traditional 5s defending Moses in the low post (not the case with Loyola).
2. Roll/replace - sometimes I think Pastner just mixes it in for variety; other times it seemed to me he was attacking specific matchups (Jose/Mike at times, Moses at times).
3. DDM - to me it has never looked like it targeted specific matchups, but maybe I missed it. otoh, he could certainly be using it to attack "general" mismatches (i.e. perimeter quickness for drives) because of the general makeup of our team/lineups. DDM certainly can put perimeter defenders "on an island".
I'm sure I have missed specific actions in our Princeton "point" series that target specific matches for isolation within the continuity of Princeton.
End of shot clock we see Jose et al go 1v1 at times, or use a simple high ball screen, but those are merely the result of shot clock situations.
And of course, at times when running our stuff and getting 1/5 switches, you will see Jose or Mike retreat dribble for a moment to abandon the offense and go 1v1 iso on a big man mismatch. But those are more players reading and reacting as opposed to Pastner calling out an iso set.
In Sperber's video he points out that Loyola leads the nation in "forcing" (baiting) opponents into long 2s off-the-dribble. My opinion is we have several guys that have shown a willingness to take too many of those exact shots this season. Several of our guards are actually ok at those shots, and against some ACC teams it is justifiable at times given our small guards. But looking at the Loyola matchups, I'd be all over our guards to not "settle" for those and to attack the rim - we have the speed advantage and they do not have a true rim protector. Sperber points out that Richmond and Wisconsin did exactly that and had success.