Blumpkin Souffle
Bidly Biddington III
- Messages
- 1,367
"If you can't handle me when I'm bulking, you don't deserve me when I'm cut" - Jonathan Dwyer
There's no way Jon gains close to 1400 yards behind what would've been a patchwork O-Line in a pro-style O, with no QB. No way he goes toe to toe with CJ Spiller in ACC PotY conversations, either.
Also as CPJ has said, there has been no back at GT since Dwyer that's as physically gifted at the B-Back position, and who literally won many games for us.
Thats been one thing that has puzzled me about the Bback position since CPJ arrived. Dwyer seemed to be an excellent reciever from the B when given the chance. Wonder why we didnt throw those screen and wheel routes more often. Laskey has also done a good job catching passes from the Bback spot. Would love to see Custis catch some passes from that position.The one thing from the CPJ offense that might have hurt Jon is he didn't get to catch many passes. The ones he did wound up being huge gains. But being the B-back allowed him to show that he can handle tough running between the tackles and he has a burst when he gets outside. You also have to be able to block, as our wide receivers who go to the NFL from this system have displayed.
I think Custis is the closest thing to Dwyer we'll have had on campus. I'm sure his workload will closely resemble Dwyer's...Thats been one thing that has puzzled me about the Bback position since CPJ arrived. Dwyer seemed to be an excellent reciever from the B when given the chance. Wonder why we didnt throw those screen and wheel routes more often. Laskey has also done a good job catching passes from the Bback spot. Would love to see Custis catch some passes from that position.
That seems to be the general consensus, hope that is correct. From reports I heard last summer Custis is a boss in the gym. Hope it translates to the field.I think Custis is the closest thing to Dwyer we'll have had on campus. I'm sure his workload will closely resemble Dwyer's...
Supposedly Dwyer has just a bit more top end but they have similar running styles, good vision and cutting.How do they compare speed wise?
Dwyer was an interesting back. He didn't look fast at all, until you realized that nobody ever caught him.
I think the notion that CPJ was the only party that benefitted from the relationship is laughable. Go back and rewind the tape. You will see Dwyer running through massive gaps getting to the second level, where he thrives, solely because of the system. You will also see him on the counter pitch with a numbers advantage he would never have otherwise. Diesel made a lot of those yards, on the second half of runs, due to his own talent, but he got into space because of the system most of the time. I have said this before on other sites and I will say it here too, AA, ZL and DS were all better at getting yards 1-5 than Dwyer was. Yards 5-90 were no contest in JD's favor. I will venture to say that I believe JD got more yards in CPJ's system than he would have gotten in any other, period. He would have been good in a NFL style offense, but not as productive in terms of total yards. Some may disagree and that is fine. I just believe it to be true.
We will just have to agree to disagree. May eyes tell me he was better than Tashard and he gained over a 1000 yards twice in Gailey's system. Dwyer would have been a 1000 yard rusher wherever he went.
True, but would he have been a 1400 yard rusher? That is the question.We will just have to agree to disagree. May eyes tell me he was better than Tashard and he gained over a 1000 yards twice in Gailey's system. Dwyer would have been a 1000 yard rusher wherever he went.
Or one of those douches who can't compliment a GT player without insulting another one.Jemea was not only a great player, but he also has gratitude in his heart for GT. He won't be one of those douches in the NFL who shout out their high school or middle school when announcing themselves in the lineup.