- Messages
- 2,856
The announcer were staing it was legal but now illegal, but this was within 5 yards of the LOS
The announcer were staing it was legal but now illegal, but this was within 5 yards of the LOS
Unfortunately we better get used to it or make sure we don’t do it. You know cutcliffe will be whining about us before we play themThat was such a bulls**t call
The announcer were staing it was legal but now illegal, but this was within 5 yards of the LOS
Unfortunately we better get used to it or make sure we don’t do it. You know cutcliffe will be whining about us before we play them
Army has moved the ball... fumbles, I hate fumbles.
Dukes’s defense looks well coached against the triple option. Hope it’s just the talent gap that is the problem for Army
Exactly, but I don't think that rule is any different this year.If the ref looked over late he may have thought it was not 10-2 angle?
CPJ mentioned this in some interview recently ... He said that some of the refs in one of our scrimmages called penalties exactly like this one and when he showed them the tape, they agreed they were not penalties. He said he sent in a tape to the league to help with these calls (and ref education). But, we'll see ... it's ridiculous. As CPJ said, if it's truly dangerous, why not outlaw tackling below the waist? Why not outlaw anything below the waist - why is it more dangerous 5 yards in front of the LOS in run blocking rather than 5 yards behind the LOS in pass blocking?
The player tried to side step the block instead of trying to beat it with his hands. It did lead to the blocker hitting at a non 10-2 angle. I do think it was a missed call, but if you only see the blocker hitting the defender, it would appear to not be 10-2. I think the entire context of the play is necessary though.If the ref looked over late he may have thought it was not 10-2 angle?
The announcer were staing it was legal but now illegal, but this was within 5 yards of the LOS