JacketFan137
Banned
- Messages
- 2,536
i will say this scheme looks a lot more qb friendly and we are getting some incredible production from our RBs and WRs after the catch that we have not seen from a tech team in a long time so that may help inflate king’s stats.This exactly. We have had four years of QB's not performing well in the majority of their games. Haynes King has played well enough for our team to win two games this year. Two data points isn't enough to anoint him the next Joe Ham, but I will gladly take what we have seen so far.
Just for comparison's sake
2022 Week 2 against WCU
Jeff Sims
QBR (weighted): 28.5
QBR (raw): 57.7
2023 Week 2 against SCST
Haynes King QBR: 84.0
QBR (raw): 94.8
King's week 1 QBR of 77.3 against Louisville also tops Jeff Sims overall best QBR performance of any game last year (vs Pitt at 56.7).
Jeff Sims highs in previous seasons were definitely high, but they were never consistent. He had the 98.9 game against UNC and 91.1 against Lousiville in 2020. Despite these highs, he ended 2020 and 2021 with qbrs of 43.7 and 52.2 respectively.
but i think you are 100% correct that we haven’t had a qb do what he’s supposed to in a long time. not just four years, i don’t think we’ve had a guy that could do his job on a snap to snap basis since justin thomas’ final season in 2016.
i think louisville is one of the better defenses we will see this season and he looked solid in what was everyone’s first game in the system. if we can gradually get better in terms of skill position (particularly TE) and o line play king could really make a run at some records for tech. it’s not like we have a long and illustrious history of passing qbs and he’s putting up numbers