SteamWhistle
Helluva Engineer
- Messages
- 4,435
- Location
- Rome, GA
Will finish 0-6 this Bowl Season.
Our 2 best teams both blown out.
Our 2 best teams both blown out.
Whose recruiting rankings are you using there?The ACC has been the worst Power 5 conference for years. I provided data to support this argument before the season started and it still holds true. Clemson is still an elite program and would compete for championships in any conference, but top-to-bottom the ACC is consistently the worst. If Clemson hadn’t turned into the powerhouse it has after FSU’s downfall it wouldn’t even be an argument.
Just look at past recruiting rankings and it’s easy to see why. In 2019 Clemson finished 9th with 28 commits. The next ACC team was Florida State at #17. Inside the top 17 there were 7 SEC teams, 3 B1G teams, 2 Big 12 teams, 2 PAC-12 teams and USC was one spot behind FSU at #18. Miami and UNC look like they could turn in contenders, but the middle and bottom of the ACC is extremely weak.
Will finish 0-6 this Bowl Season.
Our 2 best teams both blown out.
The ACC has been the worst Power 5 conference for years. I provided data to support this argument before the season started and it still holds true. Clemson is still an elite program and would compete for championships in any conference, but top-to-bottom the ACC is consistently the worst. If Clemson hadn’t turned into the powerhouse it has after FSU’s downfall it wouldn’t even be an argument.
Just look at past recruiting rankings and it’s easy to see why. In 2019 Clemson finished 9th with 28 commits. The next ACC team was Florida State at #17. Inside the top 17 there were 7 SEC teams, 3 B1G teams, 2 Big 12 teams, 2 PAC-12 teams and USC was one spot behind FSU at #18. Miami and UNC look like they could turn in contenders, but the middle and bottom of the ACC is extremely weak.
Our best two teams -- and I am holding my nose at the thought of ND -- were among the final four. Hello.Will finish 0-6 this Bowl Season.
Our 2 best teams both blown out.
If you want some laughs check out a couple of the Clemson message boards. Demands range from putting the OC in charge of the defense, or firing Venables, or giving Swinney one more year to fix this or else ...No, we are a solid 3, sometimes even a number 2. I know you are a typical ACC fan, but don't let this crap-tastic year cloud your judgement. Clemson despite this year is dominant, and the only school that can even compare with Alabama.
There have always been other "good" schools, but the problem and I think why your perception is so poor of our conference, is that they change almost yearly.
Miami can go from being an 9 to 10 win school to a dumpster fire the next year. Same with GT, we can win an orange bowl one year and go 3-8 they next.
The main perception problem of the ACC is that we don't have anybody close to Clemson. We really need a Miami, FSU, or somebody else to have a sustained level of excellence.
That is why I liked having ND in our conference this year. It wasn't just Clemson, even though they both were destroyed. The ACC got 2 bids, were was the big 12? Where has the Pac 12 ever been?
We are fine, put the self deprecation blow-torch down.
Yes, ACC is at the bottom overall or by average team.Will finish 0-6 this Bowl Season.
Our 2 best teams both blown out.
Yes, ACC is at the bottom overall or by average team.
Things would be worse if ND and Clem hadn't pulled the average ratings up.
avg ACC team loses to SEC-W by 10 and PAC-12 by 6 per sagarin ratings
.
1 SEC-WEST (A) = 81.49
2 BIG 12 (A) = 79.14
3 PAC-12-S (A) = 78.57
4 BIG TEN-W (A) = 78.26
5 BIG TEN-E (A) = 77.47
6 PAC-12-N (A) = 77.40
7 SEC-EAST (A) = 74.27
8 ACC-COA (A) = 72.14
9 ACC-ATL (A) = 71.80
If you want some laughs check out a couple of the Clemson message boards. Demands range from putting the OC in charge of the defense, or firing Venables, or giving Swinney one more year to fix this or else ...
Yeah, until the rubber hit the road.Our best two teams -- and I am holding my nose at the thought of ND -- were among the final four. Hello.
He's like 99.9% of them. When his team is getting their @$$ kicked on the LOS and the other team's athletes are better than his, he becomes an average to bad coach. Who was it that said "physical superiority cancels out all theories"?Brent Venables isn’t as good when he can’t steal the other teams play calls apparently.
That.... is a terrible theory.He's like 99.9% of them. When his team is getting their @$$ kicked on the LOS and the other team's athletes are better than his, he becomes an average to bad coach. Who was it that said "physical superiority cancels out all theories"?