augustabuzz
Helluva Engineer
- Messages
- 3,412
The ACC is 2nd to the SEC over the last 5 years(including the 0-6), in CFP wins and bowl wins. The other 3 P5 conferences just had their 1st CFP win in the last 5 years.
The other 3 P5 conferences just had their 1st CFP win in the last 5 years.
I think you missed the most pertinent information. Until last Friday, the other 3 P5 conferences, that some have claimed as better than the ACC, had been oh for five in the biggest wins column.Isn't this only the 6th year of the playoffs? Not sure that's a great argument in either direction...
I think you missed the most pertinent information. Until last Friday, the other 3 P5 conferences, that some have claimed as better than the ACC, had been oh for five in the biggest wins column.
Not everyone, but i’m pretty certain about where you fall in the sh!tty “fans” spectrum."Miserable A-holes", "dickweeds", whatever. I'll bet you have a handy invective for everyone with whom you disagree.
Yeah, I'm likewise pretty sure about you, Blow.Not everyone, but i’m pretty certain about where you fall in the sh!tty “fans” spectrum.
Perfect- lets ignore the hell out of each other......good bye.Yeah, I'm likewise pretty sure about you, Blow.
We haven't had 10 years yet.No. I am a firm believer the ACC is the 2nd or third best P5 conference, and I generally agree with a lot of the facts being presented by all here. I was just amused at the quote: "The other 3 P5 conferences just had their 1st CFP win in the last 5 years."
I mean, I just find it funny that not winning a CFP game in year one suddenly makes one a lesser conference.
You'd think this thread was an orchard with all the cherry picking from both sides to "prove" their points....
We haven't had 10 years yet.
No, it doesn't.reinforces my point.
No, it doesn't.
No, it means that people tend to look back 5 years and not 6. In a few more years people may look back 10 years.Yes. It does. Your quote was: "The other 3 P5 conferences just had their 1st CFP win in the last 5 years."
Since the playoffs have only been around for six years, that stat you quoted is meaningless. Arguing that we haven't had 10 years only reinforces the meaningless of only winning a CFP game in "the last 5 years."
In the end, this whole thread is filled with meaningless stats, but that particular one is probably the biggest cherry that's been picked yet.
FWIW, I believe the ACC is a good conference, and other than the B1G, probably the most complete conference when considering both football and basketball.
No, it means that people tend to look back 5 years and not 6. In a few more years people may look back 10 years.
Gotta say, that I agree with @augustabuzz on this one. Saying last 5 years means exactly that. In the last 5 years, no one from the other three P5 conferences has won a playoff game. That's a pretty telling statement and implies nothing further.But the implication in the sentence is that winning their first CFP game in the last 5 years means that there was a prolonged time without a CFP win. As the CFP is only 6 years old, it's a misleading stat. If the CFP was 8-9 yrs old, I could see the justification of only quoting the last 5 years, as it stands, the last 5 years are 83% of the CFP era.
Conversely, you could also argue that ALL P5 conferences won CFP games within the first 5 years. It's a stat that means very little...
Anyone who doesn't think the pac12 is the worst conference in cfb, probably isn't paying attention to the rest of the nation.Not as long as the Big 12, Pac 12 and this year the Big 10 are around. God, we have an inferiority complex.
Anyone who doesn't think the pac12 is the worst conference in cfb, probably isn't paying attention to the rest of the nation.
Their commissioner takes a lot of the blame, but they've had the biggest drop in 5 year attendance (~13% compared to the ACCs ~3% 2013-2018). No national champion since 2004 (which was vacated). Only one entry to the playoffs since 2015. Plus a really bad tv network and deal.
They're easily the most irrelevant conference in the p5.
While you're laughing at the Pac-12, isn't their TV Deal (despite all the criticism)- paying out the same as the ACC's TV Deal, TBH, I'm not sure any Conf. can be laughed at when you look at the lack of success of our own ACCNAnyone who doesn't think the pac12 is the worst conference in cfb, probably isn't paying attention to the rest of the nation.
Their commissioner takes a lot of the blame, but they've had the biggest drop in 5 year attendance (~13% compared to the ACCs ~3% 2013-2018). No national champion since 2004 (which was vacated). Only one entry to the playoffs since 2015. Plus a really bad tv network and deal.
They're easily the most irrelevant conference in the p5.
USC (the real one), U-Dub, Oregon, Utah, Stanford can all elevate themselves into the Top-10 maybe Top-15 discussion with USC & Oregon having the ability to make a run at the CFP with the right HC, that's more than you can say for 13 out of 14 members of our Conf