Sounds like some players making excuses to me. I don’t buy the change bs , sounds like y would equal rest if in fact true. Hell boys , stuff happens in baseball. CDH runs the most successful of the major sports teams by far , and all y’all do is ***** about it. It is by far the most unpredictable, the most talented team doesn’t win by a far wider margin than the others. The coach can’t catch, hit , or pitch. Better be thankful for what baseball has provided to the fans, the REAL fans are.
I tend to agree. Interesting question you snuck in there... he probably has led/provided the most successful 25 year run when compared to FB & MBB. Perhaps.... the response would be "that's not saying much" ...but I'd say it is saying something.
I'd be curious from anyone willing to respond... & up front.... this is NOT a defense of having kept Hall. I want to understand the mindset & thought process of those posting who have a different opinion than I do.
I am on record (I think) as pretty risk-averse. Therefore, I generally have been inclined to believe Hall has settled in at really good (not great); but more importantly to me, I am not convinced change would mean anything better. And...even though it hasn't happened yet.. Hall could get over hump IMO.
So... if you are not like me, do you believe any "average" college baseball coach could have done exactly what Hall's done over last 10-15 seasons? ....that would include recruiting the talent Hall has brought in & running a well-respected program with no shenanigans. If so, what makes you think that? Help me out... just saying it would be "worth a shot" is an answer, but I'd view that as somewhat of a cop out to the question.
Related example/question... Mike Martin at FSU is retiring after 40 years of coaching... 15 more than CDH. Martin has made the postseason every year. As if that is isn't impressive enough, if he wins 1 more game... he will have had at least 40 wins in each season too. He's been ranked #1 numerous times... sometimes for long stretches. However, he's never won the national championship. All that to ask...if that was a Tech coach/history, at what point (if ever) would you be calling for a coaching change because talent, regular season success, 40+ wins... why no championship? What's he doing "wrong"?
Again... I want to understand where the line is? Is the definition of success continually ratcheted up... until you just demand change because of frustration or something?