JorgeJonas
Helluva Engineer
- Messages
- 1,147
2014 Miami had seven possessions, not counting the kneel down at the end of the game.
Bulls Fan here... Our first game against Elon was a test to see how our freshman play. The whole 2nd half was our 2nd team basically. BB can drop dimes no problem and we have a really good receiving core. USF fans don't like Kean. If you have any questions please ask.
Also our fan Forum is www.thebullspen.com
I agree. The only issue to over is the number of possessions. If we have 3 or 4 8 min drives then maybe not.
I doubt we have many drives over 5 min. This year. We almost dont want that, more chances for a dumb fumble. Of course we would love to win a game 28-10 and have the ball for 65% of the time, but our bbacks have shown they cannot hold onto the ball. We need to get a good lead early and hang on for dear life.
I think just the opposite.
With our aggressive D emphasizing penetrating gaps and swarming to the ball, it becomes more important to give our D more rest between series, imo.
We want the clock and limited possessions to add to the pressure on opposition O.
I agree, I just feel our offense will not be that great this year. Just a feeling we almost see a regression instead of an improvement and we dont see a 2009/2014 year until graham is under center.
From my experience home field is a 3-4 point swing (typically) I think if we were at home we'd be favored by 7, maybe with the hook at 7.5. Either way I agree it is a little high, but I think GT wins going away because they play no defense and we will keep them off the field.So 3.5 pt fave on the road would be a 6.5 pt fave on a neutral field or about 9.5 pt fave at home. When you think about it like that it seems a touch high. Wouldn't be surprised to see this drop a little
Too frugal my @$$ I have action every weekend haha
The prognosticor's rationale is ludicrous. We struggle to move the ball against teams with elite athletes (which makes me think Clemson or UGA last year). He is saying USF has elite athletes on defense this year.
His rationale is ludicrous. We struggle to move the ball against teams with elite athletes (which makes me think Clemson or UGA last year). He is saying USF has elite athletes.
Well, we aren't that Orlando school that pronounces things into reality. *ahem* National Champions.
Oh we know he'll never be back and he shouldn't have been fired. That player was a crybaby and his father was in it for the money. Now no one will hire him and he's kinda just floating in the world (Tampa Area).Yep, remember him. He did a great build down there. And I don’t think there’s any way he can come back there. Not sure he can head coach again.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Well, we aren't that Orlando school that pronounces things into reality. *ahem* National Champions.
You know, honestly I can't blame them. I personally wouldn't have voted them #1, but they gave a damned good accounting of themselves going undefeated and beating the team that beat both of the teams in the NC game. You have to give them credit. I know their schedule wasn't so difficult overall, but that was hardly their fault. I know some say they ducked us, but they had us on their schedule to begin with. And honestly would probably have beaten us. Yeah, and maybe Auburn wasn't so fired up to play them but that wasn't their fault, either.
I still think we would've beat them, but I agree with your logic.