Coronavirus Thread

  • Thread starter Deleted member 2897
  • Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.

GT_EE78

Banned
Messages
3,605
Chinese PRC propaganda promoted “Virus Racism Awareness” in Italy a month ago where the focus was on giving chinese people hugs...how did that work out?
 

jwsavhGT

Helluva Engineer
Retired Staff
Messages
4,531
Location
Savannah,GA
FB_IMG_1584203155886.jpg
 

GT_EE78

Banned
Messages
3,605
johnshopkins now has a twitter account to give status of their other website repair and maintenance,
 

GT_EE78

Banned
Messages
3,605
this helicopter shot of Santa Clarita costco is epic.
they are pretty orderly thanks to the cop cars.
imagine being in that line and then you finally get in the store and the TP Is gone

 
Messages
13,443
Location
Augusta, GA
The English are feeling the pinch in relation to recent virus threat and have therefore raised their threat level from “Miffed” to “Peeved.” Soon, though, level may be raised yet again to “Irritated” or even “A Bit Cross.”

The English have not been “A Bit Cross” since the blitz in 1940 when tea supplies nearly ran out.

The virus has been re-categorized from “Tiresome” to “A Bloody Nuisance.” The last time the British issued a “Bloody Nuisance” warning level was in 1588, when threatened by the Spanish Armada.

The Scots have raised their threat level from “Pissed Off” to “Let's Get the Bastard.” They don't have any other levels. This is the reason they have been used on the front line of the British army for the last 300 years.

The French government announced yesterday that it has raised its alert level from “Run” to “Hide.” The only two higher levels in France are “Collaborate” and “Surrender.” The rise was precipitated by a recent fire that destroyed France's white flag factory, effectively paralyzing the country's military capability.

Italy has increased the alert level from “Shout Loudly and Excitedly” to “Elaborate Military Posturing.” Two more levels remain: “Ineffective Combat Operations” and “Change Sides.”

The Germans have increased their alert state from “Disdainful Arrogance” to “Dress in Uniform and Sing Marching Songs.” They also have two higher levels: “Invade a Neighbor” and “Lose.”

Belgians, on the other hand, are all on holiday as usual; the only threat they are worried about is NATO pulling out of Brussels.

The Spanish are all excited to see their new submarines ready to deploy. These beautifully designed subs have glass bottoms so the new Spanish navy can get a really good look at the old Spanish navy.

Australia, meanwhile, has raised its alert level from “No worries” to “She'll be alright, Mate.” Two more escalation levels remain: “Crikey! I think we'll need to cancel the barbie this weekend!” and “The barbie is cancelled.” So far, no situation has ever warranted use of the final escalation level.

The Russians have said “It’s not us”
 

RonJohn

Helluva Engineer
Messages
4,994
Here is a video on Youtube by Wired discussing quarantines, and possibility of mass quarantines in the US. If you don't want to watch, he basically says that the economic and human rights impacts of a lockdown like in China or Italy probably would not be accepted by the public. One interesting thing he points out is that the goal of school closures and cancelling public events isn't really to reduce the number of cases of the disease, but to "flatten the curve" so that health facilities are not over stressed. i.e. If the same number of people get sick over a longer period there will be beds and respirators available that won't be if everyone gets sick at the same time.

 

chris975d

Ramblin' Wreck
Messages
903
Here is a video on Youtube by Wired discussing quarantines, and possibility of mass quarantines in the US. If you don't want to watch, he basically says that the economic and human rights impacts of a lockdown like in China or Italy probably would not be accepted by the public. One interesting thing he points out is that the goal of school closures and cancelling public events isn't really to reduce the number of cases of the disease, but to "flatten the curve" so that health facilities are not over stressed. i.e. If the same number of people get sick over a longer period there will be beds and respirators available that won't be if everyone gets sick at the same time.



Yeah, flattening the curve has been the goal. Drag the impact/length of time out, but also drag the peak at any one time down. As you stated, to lessen the number affected/in treatment at any one time. Our healthcare system cannot handle anything resembling a hard spike.
 

Lotta Booze

Ramblin' Wreck
Messages
779
Yeah, flattening the curve has been the goal. Drag the impact/length of time out, but also drag the peak at any one time down. As you stated, to lessen the number affected/in treatment at any one time. Our healthcare system cannot handle anything resembling a hard spike.

Yes, the goal. If we can help ourselves

 

takethepoints

Helluva Engineer
Messages
6,095
Here is a video on Youtube by Wired discussing quarantines, and possibility of mass quarantines in the US. If you don't want to watch, he basically says that the economic and human rights impacts of a lockdown like in China or Italy probably would not be accepted by the public. One interesting thing he points out is that the goal of school closures and cancelling public events isn't really to reduce the number of cases of the disease, but to "flatten the curve" so that health facilities are not over stressed. i.e. If the same number of people get sick over a longer period there will be beds and respirators available that won't be if everyone gets sick at the same time.


Hmmmmmm. After reading these projections, the level of "public acceptance" might change. See:

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/13/...action=click&module=Spotlight&pgtype=Homepage

The number of deaths, given various "attack rates" and less effective social distancing, are quite similar to the estimates at The Incidental Economist I posted here last week (I think). As with these estimates, the assumption is that the virus will get a good run at most of the population. If we stop that, then the number of cases will decrease and, probably, rapidly.

But make no mistake: if we find ourselves dealing with hundreds of thousands of deaths social distancing like we see today will look like a kindergarten picnic. Let's hope that we get those anti-virals up to speed and distributed asap. Right now I think that's our best bet.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top