So according to the article - maybe not all of the increase is from increased testing, but some of it is, but some of it isn't, some might be from a data dump, some of it might not be......
That story doesn't really inspire confidence in anything other than the data isn't perfect to draw conclusions. I have been looking at the IHME data, which has an "estimated infections" that I believe is using the percent positive along with the number of confirmed infections to estimate how many people are actually infected. That estimate has been dropping since early May, even as confirmed results have been steady or even increasing. People predicted that an exponential increase would be apparent two weeks after opening back up. Then it would take three to four weeks. Now people are predicting six to eight weeks? We are at about five weeks I believe.
It is still possible that things will get worse. If it does, there is a very long way to go before we overload the health care system. Even if it does get worse, I would rather have attempts to get people to act responsibly than have mandated shutdowns in a shotgun spread. Require masks in public, sure. Encourage people to engage in good hygiene, sure that should happen all of the time. Prohibit a guy separated from other people by 20' with a leaf blower from clearing a parking lot of leaves, why? We can use some common sense without resorting to extreme measures.