Florida has had about 29,000 confirmed cases. About 17.500 of those are in Dade, Broward, and Palm Beach counties. The temperature there is currently in the high 80s low 90s with humidity from the mid 60s to mid 80s. Is Miami in the green section of that map?
You are correct that it is Fall in Brazil, but the temperature is not cool, and the humidity is not low. Where is Brazil on that map? Is it in the green? It is actually about as far into the red as you can possibly go.
It is a huge stretch to determine that since there are many diagnosed cases in more Northern areas, the virus can't survive heat and humidity and will die out during the Summer. That story originally came from the Gateway Pundit, which is a conservative organization. Step back and read the article without "belief". It starts with a solution. Then it finds snippets of facts that fit that solution and ignores facts (even in the same data it is presenting) that do not fit the solution. The wording and phrasing of the article are made to give the impression that if you don't agree with their "solution" then you are stupid.
I don't care if an article is from a conservative organization or a liberal organization. I try to absorb facts from many sources and arrive at my own conclusions. I try to be skeptical of all sources of information. With this story, ask these questions: If the virus can't thrive in warm climate areas, then why is it thriving in New Orleans and Miami? If the virus thrives in cool climates, why is it not thriving in Minneapolis and Milwaukee?
New York has a ton of cases, but look at this map from the CDC:
View attachment 8255
Does that match the only in cool climate theory?
As I stated before, it might subside as things warm up, but this article hasn't presented any evidence of that. It makes strongly worded claims, provides some data points that don't really back those claims, and tries to force belief because of how forceful the writing is. To get me to believe something, they should present the data and let me come to my own conclusion. In this case, the data the present doesn't even back their own claims, much less convince me they are correct.