Saying in your motion to dismiss that FSU can attempt to repurchase their media rights and then immediately shutting down any attempts to repurchase their media rights doesn't seem like the best legal strategy.
I will remember that. I just hope the moderators will not selectively decide which posts they feel like flagging as insults based on their own personal feelings.There's a report button underneath the messages. If you feel a post breaks the rules, hit that button and send it to us for moderation.
Right about here...
.............
Words matter. "Attempt" to purchase didn't indicate that it would be successful. Remember, this is in response to FSU calling this a "penalty". The ACC is pointing out that it is a property ownership and commercial transaction instead of a "penalty". They are not giving any indication of what the response to any "attempt" would be. They are simply pointing out that the GOR is not legally part of the ACC withdrawal process and is not a withdrawal fee.
Yes, the ACC is arguing that it is not a penalty because FSU has the option to attempt to repurchase their media rights. If that option doesn't actually exist and the ACC has no intention of letting them repurchase then this entire argument from the motion to dismiss is null and void. Surely you can see that right?
I would not assume that it will take that long. I mean, it could take that long. But if they raise the money, it might happen a lot quicker.
Almost 360 pages and this is the most puzzling post. I am sure there is someone here who can refute this. But it ain't me!
Reported as serial post mocking
Words matter. Is it a penalty, or a commercial transaction? Not engaging in a commercial transaction is very different than punishing someone in a legal sense. It might be the same thing from a moral perspective, but morals and feelings don't generally apply to contract law. Laws and words in contacts are what matter.
Superbowl rating was highest since 2017.
Ron, you typed a half dozen times that you’re not an attorney, yet you are arguing as if you are. Can others have differing opinions?
Most certainly. If anyone wants to point out flaws in the ACC bylaws or the GOR, or laws that support FSU I welcome that. I'm fact, I would very much appreciate someone helping me understand the logic of FSU's arguments. Not the emotions behind it, but the logic and laws. If someone wants to say that they don't feel as though the GOR is fair, then say that. Everyone is entitled to feel however they want to feel. I have just been arguing that someone's emotional feelings about what should be fair or not don't dispute my arguments about the logic of the fillings. Nobody should believe that the law says something just because they feel that is the way the law should be. That is how sovereign citizens act.
I don’t necessarily disagree, but a full on hammer lock is a bit much. Opinions don’t have to be right. Every one doesn’t require a 5 paragraph refutation. Me, you, all the rest, can all toss a thought or two out there. None of us have it figured out.
Taylor Swift effect
