thebull35
Jolly Good Fellow
- Messages
- 237
- Location
- Stone Mountain
Let's hope not
Go back and read yesterday's post at 2:05 and tell me that's not him.Let's hope not
Smh...all I can sayGo back and read yesterday's post at 2:05 and tell me that's not him.
Rexy, is that you?It doesn't represent GT sports very well to criticize a former recruit's Mother.
If recruits are off-limits, shouldn't their parents be off-limits also?
A flip is very simple.
Question 1: Does a recruit have a committable offer, and has said recruit pledged his commitment to School A?
Question 2: Did said recruit decommit from School A and pledge his commitment to School B?
If the answer to Questions 1 and 2 are both YES, then the recruit flipped his commitment. The reason why the recruit flipped his commitment is irrelevent to the discussion. There could be a myriad of reasons "why" the kid flipped, but unless School A rescended the scholarship offer, when a kid decommits from one school and commits to another, that's a flip.
It depends on what the definition of "is" is.
Really is the off season.
Two things: unless you have first hand knowledge of JT's conversation with Saban, don't spout opinion as fact. Both JT and Menocal were flips. They both were committed to a school that would have accepted their LOI on Signing Day and then changed their commitment to another school, period. The reason doesn't matter.Coaching changes like at Miami with Menocal, or when a HC says you can't play QB at our school is the same as a rescinded scholly offer.
Miami's new HC told Menocal he was a TE as long as he was the HC, the same way that Saban told JT you're not a QB as long as I'm the HC, in both of those cases even though there is no official rescinding of the scholly, a logical person can see that those schollys were no longer on the table, and because of that GT was able to sign those players.
You're missing the point. The main point is that these guys were good enough to get offers from factories in the first place. Saying it's not a "flip" is splitting hairs and pointless.Coaching changes like at Miami with Menocal, or when a HC says you can't play QB at our school is the same as a rescinded scholly offer.
Miami's new HC told Menocal he was a TE as long as he was the HC, the same way that Saban told JT you're not a QB as long as I'm the HC, in both of those cases even though there is no official rescinding of the scholly, a logical person can see that those schollys were no longer on the table, and because of that GT was able to sign those players.
Splitting hairs is important if the facts do not support your agenda.You're missing the point. The main point is that these guys were good enough to get offers from factories in the first place. Saying it's not a "flip" is splitting hairs and pointless.
You're missing the point. The main point is that these guys were good enough to get offers from factories in the first place. Saying it's not a "flip" is splitting hairs and pointless.
Two things: unless you have first hand knowledge of JT's conversation with Saban, don't spout opinion as fact. Both JT and Menocal were flips. They both were committed to a school that would have accepted their LOI on Signing Day and then changed their commitment to another school, period. The reason doesn't matter.
What you wrote above just isn't true.
Al Golden wanted Menocal as long as he wanted to play TE, only then would he have accepted his LOI.
Saban would have accepted JT's LOI as a DB/WR/KR, Saban was not going to accept JT's LOI as a QB.
Why do you guys feel the need to re-write history?