forensicbuzz
21st Century Throwback Dad
- Messages
- 8,833
- Location
- North Shore, Chicago
Well, Washington is in the B1G next year and Texas is in the $EC. Doesn't that make it a B1G v. $EC playoff?
And so many of our folks justify it and laugh, and talk about how we should give more and buy more tickets.If I read this correctly, this costs the ACC $6 million
If FSU goes to the semifinals, then Louisville goes to the Orange Bowl. That’s $6 million for the semifinals and $4 million for the Orange Bowl
With FSU going to the Orange Bowl, the ACC just gets $4 million
The publicity and other effects are bigger—the ACC is cast as little league
College Football Playoff Payouts
How much do teams make for the College Football Playoff? We've got the 2023-24 revenue distribution plan plus payouts from past years.businessofcollegesports.com
The bcs selection criteria was far and away better than a closed council with no oversight.Aside from a brief historical blip known as the BCS, this has always been the process. Even in the BCS, it was a factor.
I hope the playoff is able to provide transparency and “fairness” but I’m not overly optimistic. Backroom handshakes seem to be engrained in the process.
I agree with everything but his conclusion. Yes, all those things add up to a good screwing, but none of them were aimed directly at FSU. What the committee did was screw FSU directly. Yea, somebody had to be screwed, do to prior stupidity, but they wove their tale to make that team/conference FSU/ACC.Interesting take from Dan Wetzel, Yahoo Sports:
“It wasn’t though, mainly because the system that was set up back when these players were in elementary school didn’t account for — or care about — what played out in 2023.
The people who designed a four-team playoff back then really didn’t want to design a four-team playoff — or any kind of playoff. So they did a terrible job.
They knew they needed to move past the two-team Bowl Championship Series. However, too many of their motivations had little to do with determining a champion on the field or setting up the most exciting postseason. Instead they were focused on protecting the bowl industry, maintaining the Rose Bowl’s late-afternoon New Year’s Day television window (and second-half sunset over the San Gabriel Mountains) and making a glacial move from two to four when a bold one was needed and inevitable.
Florida State was further impacted by the misplaced emotions of the commissioners of the Big Ten, Pac-12 and, yes, its very own ACC in the summer of 2021. Plans to expand the playoff to 12 teams before the 2023 season were nearly complete at the time. Then Texas and Oklahoma called the SEC and asked about leaving the Big 12. SEC commissioner Greg Sankey got the deal done, and his league will expand to 16 teams next season.
The other leagues began saber rattling and acting like every other league wouldn’t have done the same thing the SEC did.
They formed the so-called “Alliance,” which supposedly would create stability against SEC aggression. It was comical and ridiculous. Within a year, the Big Ten raided the Pac-12 for USC and UCLA starting in 2024. Later, it finished the league off by grabbing Oregon and Washington. The Big 12 and ACC then picked off the rest.
The ACC got played a fool. In the process, the playoff expansion was tabled until everyone calmed down. By the time the original expansion plan was finally agreed upon it was too late for this season. It'll start in 2024, with automatic bids for top conference champions. It's one year too late for Florida State.
That left the Seminoles — or anyone else — exposed to the exact situation that played out.
They won all their games and it wasn’t good enough.
They scheduled aggressively in the non-con, beat LSU and Florida, and it wasn’t good enough.
They saw the ACC go 6-4 against the SEC and it wasn’t good enough.
They survived an injury to their star player and it wasn’t good enough.
Florida State got screwed.
Not so much by a committee that had to screw someone, but by its own leadership booth in 2021, and more than a decade ago, that focused too much on politics and business and everything except assuring that something like this couldn't happen.”
As a result, this becomes an almost impossible game to pick. FSU looks faster and more athletic to me but not sure if that team will show up. Georgia blew their one big game this year so they either will have a chip on their shoulder or we saw exactly who they are against a competitive team.This game is very depends on who opts out for both teams and how motivated either team is to play the game. Both think they should be in the CFP.
I have no idea if someone I'm ignoring has already pointed this out, but the CFP this year is two B1G teams against 2 $EC teams. Next year Washington is in the B1G and Texas is in the $EC. So, it all kind of makes sense.
The BCS criteria were hardly some fixed impartial thing. They were changed when people complained about the computers for a few years in a row and we got another split title because of SOS-y shenanigans causing a “the wrong two out of three teams were picked” perception in 2003. And then changed more after that.The bcs selection criteria was far and away better than a closed council with no oversight.
All they had to do was say “top 4 in bcs rankings advance” and we would not have had this scenario. ESPN knew they would want to pull this **** and forced the format we have.
All true, of course, and yet none of that disproves the point that it was still the best system we’ve ever had.The BCS criteria were hardly some fixed impartial thing. They were changed when people complained about the computers for a few years in a row and we got another split title because of SOS-y shenanigans causing a “the wrong two out of three teams were picked” perception in 2003. And then changed more after that.
Yeah, I feel unusually bitter about this. I try to reflect on why and it’s no one thing. But possible reasons include……And so many of our folks justify it and laugh, and talk about how we should give more and buy more tickets.
UGA has 7 potential top 100 draft picks and FSU has 6 potential top 100 draft picks. How those players decide to play/not play will have a huge baring on the game.Northeast, I have no idea how the opting out will fall out. But i' m thinking two teams furious about being left out will play their butts off. Like you I think FSU will win. Neither Georgia nor Alabama looked as good as they often do.
There was always a problem with selecting 2 out of 100+ teams. Any format would have broken down when only two teams could be chosen. Let’s say FSU qb was healthy this year, the bcs picking two would be a nightmare.The BCS criteria were hardly some fixed impartial thing. They were changed when people complained about the computers for a few years in a row and we got another split title because of SOS-y shenanigans causing a “the wrong two out of three teams were picked” perception in 2003. And then changed more after that.
If Patrick Mahomes gets injured tomorrow, Kansas City is still in the playoffs. No other self-respecting sport would do this.
What are you talking about? Every one of the big leagues puts teams like that in the playoffs. Baltimore won a superbowl with a QB that couldn’t hit the water from the dock.Yes, but also at this point — and with its starting QB —the Atlanta Falcons would also be in the playoffs. And no other respectable league would do this.
I probably shoulda read through this last page before posting my own agreeing thought about BCS! But I’m 100% agreement with you — Top 4 in BCS formula is the way to go -The bcs selection criteria was far and away better than a closed council with no oversight.
All they had to do was say “top 4 in bcs rankings advance” and we would not have had this scenario. ESPN knew they would want to pull this **** and forced the format we have.