RonJohn
Helluva Engineer
- Messages
- 5,048
What they are arguing is that actual metrics such as conference championships and head to head results shouldn't actually matter. Kirby is arguing that regardless of the objective data, his team is obviously one of the four best teams in FBS and should be in regardless of whether other teams "deserve" to be in based on their record.Right... most deserving isn't a thing. It hasn't been defined. Why is it out there? It has no meaning. When Kirby & others use it... they are playing word games. Nonsense.
The whole thing, including what Hancock and the committee say is just word salad. The CFP website says "Every FBS team has equal access to the playoff based on its performance.". If that is true, then based on "performance" any undefeated P5 conference champion is "deserving" of making the playoffs. Hancock talks like a marketing salesguy. He is going to gaslight anyone who disagrees with the committee's rankings.