Dottie1145
Helluva Engineer
- Messages
- 2,217
2020 is the worst.
“From inside the stadium they look great!” Would have also sufficed._________________________________________
At 50,000 feet they look great!
Have you ever actually been on the newest generation of field turf? If you didn’t know it was turf you probably would suspect it being different than grass. Turf does start to look worse as it wears down, but by the time it looks worse it’s usually time to replace it anyway. Also, being cheap? I’m sorry but GTAA doesn’t have money coming out of its ears. This provides opportunities to make more profits, and spend less. Do you want to be competitive? Or would you rather continue to be the same?
Shew!!! Don’t these fields just look HORRIBLE.
View attachment 8409 View attachment 8410 View attachment 8411
View attachment 8413
Come on guys. It’s literally not a big deal. Honestly if they wouldn’t have publicized the change, nobody would’ve even noticed by the time the season started.
Turf is incredibly easy to change. Way easier than grass. They had a turf zamboni that they use to wash the turf and remove paint. Same process to switch from soccer Saturday to football Sunday in MBS.Wonder if this makes it easier to have another Atlanta United game. Have they said if the football lines will be easy to remove?
I swear I still have scars from that old carpet. I do like the grass, but let’s see what this looks like & what it’s like in the September heat before we go catatonic on the change.From the article:
And that's why the reasoning behind doing this is sound. But I for one still don't like it. But IIWIIPeople complain about money and the lack thereof, but there ain’t 90k Tech fans beating down the doors to get into Bobby Dodd... this was done to bring extra revenue streams in a very desirable locations in a major metropolitan city. Pure and simple it is a good move for money.
Do you guys not remember what the field looked like last year?
View attachment 8414
Now, can you guys honestly say that the turf fields look objectively worse than the natural grass fields?
View attachment 8415
View attachment 8417
View attachment 8416
View attachment 8419
View attachment 8418
Worst idea in the history of GT football. This is probably a Collins thing I’m assuming? Grant Field at BDS is like a goddamn cathedral, but let’s mess it up I guess?
Few plush grassy stadiums still exist and they are sacred and gorgeous. Bama, Auburn, UGA, Fla, Tenn, South Carolina, Clemson, USC, UNC, Penn St etc.
Programs that have changed to turf and are now painful to watch as a fan: Notre Dame, Michigan, Ohio State, Lville.
It’s a sad day for me, but I’ll live.
The crew had one bad year. We can cut them some slackDo you guys not remember what the field looked like last year?
View attachment 8414
Now, can you guys honestly say that the turf fields look objectively worse than the natural grass fields?
View attachment 8415
View attachment 8417
View attachment 8416
View attachment 8419
View attachment 8418
Ummm, yeah. That was kinda the point. There really no difference in how they look. Auburn’s field during the Iron Bowl was dying in places. Georgia’s field looks good and green because that game was in September. But overall there’s no real visual difference in high quality turf vs. grass.Lol You’re posting a few stadium pics with natural grass you realize that right? Nevermind.
Today sucks.
Oh this ain’t a shot at the crew. Those guys are great, arguably one of the best crews in the country at the college or pro level. I’ve met Chris May countless times, mostly because of our baseball connection. The point of that post was just to say that natural grass can look really bad at times, and in many cases worse than artificial turf. When it comes down to money, this is the right call.The crew had one bad year. We can cut them some slack
Worst idea in the history of GT football. This is probably a Collins thing I’m assuming? Grant Field at BDS is like a goddamn cathedral, but let’s mess it up I guess?
Few plush grassy stadiums still exist and they are sacred and gorgeous. Bama, Auburn, UGA, Fla, Tenn, South Carolina, Clemson, USC, UNC, Penn St etc.
Programs that have changed to turf and are now painful to watch as a fan: Notre Dame, Michigan, Ohio State, Lville.
It’s a sad day for me, but I’ll live.
Yes. Just wanted to confirm that. I know Georgia State’s turf the lines were sewn in and you couldn’t Zamboni it up.Turf is incredibly easy to change. Way easier than grass. They had a turf zamboni that they use to wash the turf and remove paint. Same process to switch from soccer Saturday to football Sunday in MBS.
Indistinguishable describing grass and the grass carpets is very odd. It’s extremely different, from the look to the feel. This is being cheap, nothing more.
Honestly I don’t think heat will be that big of a problem with this newer turf. Places just as hot as Atlanta have turf like: Texas, Houston, Memphis, Tulane, UNC, Wake, Baylor, Oklahoma State, Texas Tech, Arizona, Cal, Ole Miss, Mizzou.I swear I still have scars from that old carpet. I do like the grass, but let’s see what this looks like & what it’s like in the September heat before we go catatonic on the change.