- Messages
- 12,104
- Location
- Marietta, GA
UConn has looked dominant.
Not sure I am all in on that the Networks influence the selections or seedlings.I think we're missing each other. I'm saying there is a financial incentive to promote teams from certain conferences. That seems to jive with what you're saying. What am I missing?
How do you go on a 30-0 run in an Elite Eight game. OMGUConn has looked dominant.
As much as I wanted 2 ACC school in the FF, Clemsoning is far more entertaining.Clemsoning from free throw line.
To go on a 30-0 run in the Elite 8 requires both teams to excel at what they are doing.How do you go on a 30-0 run in an Elite Eight game. OMG
Just coming to post this. I have no issue whatsoever with their top seeds. Of course, that’s like spotting 5* talent on a basketball court. The AQ’s take care of themselves. It’s the middle teams that are tough to do. It’s all about how you evaluate and distribute bids to the mass of middle teams that gets so screwed up, and they do that annually.Well, the commitee finally got something right. The fonal four has ACC, BIG, SEC, BIGEAST matchups. Should be entertaining.
I don't think it says who should be invited. I am pretty sure it does say that the "ACC only has a couple of competitive teams" is both wrong and dead. It also kills "tired legs" theory after they won 5 in 5 to win the ACC and survived the playoff game immediately after.Should NCST have been invited if they didn't win the ACC Tournament? The results in the NCAA Tournament say yes, but they wouldn't have been.
They were #10 in the ACC with a 9-11 conference record.
Hard to choose those that truly deserve to be in the NCAA Tournament. Maybe more ammo that maybe the ACC should of had 10 teams in the tournament.