ncjacket79
Helluva Engineer
- Messages
- 1,237
True but most kids today who are smart enough to actually go to Tech or Stanford understand that not all degrees are equal. Tech feels no need to market what we have to the typical HS student but we need to develop a way to highlight the positives to prospective athletes. It needs to be high tech and show them how it will help them if they want to be a doctor or a businessman or engineer or coach. Use examples of past athletes and what they have become. We may be doing some of this as far as I know but i’m Talking about a real marketing effort to HSs in GA and the SE.This still doesn't address the main difference between Stanford and Tech: Tech is a technical school. Tech's main comparison isn't Stanford; it's MIT.
Everything else that sets Tech apart is fixable; we can raise more money, we can change recruiting resources, we can copy the "Stanford Model" in many ways. What we can't do - because there is no-one interested in doing it - is change the character of the place. That means we really need an innovative program to find the recruits who want to come to Tech. Imo, more resources are only the first step. We'll see if we can do this.