I agree with @AE 87. These D stats are way misleading.
They d statistically appeared good because we hogged the ball on O. It just is a fact
The D allowed 9 yards per play folks. NINE. That is unreal high. Yes I am happy we forced turnovers. I get it, but a really tough thing to rely on. Yes we did ok in spots. And yes at the end of the day we did allow 3 points over 3 quarters. Ok great too. But alot of this is window dressing to a degree. I know its a team game, and as it should be....but the D can't allow this type of chunks on a per play basis. It just can't. Its a horrible number....and yes I get points is the ultimate measure...but again, our Offense was by far the better defense yesterday than the defense
The 9 yards per play is partially the Duke Johnson effect, we seriously can NOT stop that guy.
And how the crap do you get 9 yards per pop over a whole game and come away with only 17 points?
Probably the same way you can have Duke Johnson and still manage to lose three games.
Thats what i told my wife last night, that if i was his O coord that i would either handoff or pass him the ball every fraking play possible lolIf I was Al Golden, the way Duke was playing last night, I'd hand it off to him every other play. He only got like 14 carries.
Both Miami and UGA, esp UGA, should run the ball almost as much as we do.
I agree with @AE 87. These D stats are way misleading.
They d statistically appeared good because we hogged the ball on O. It just is a fact
The D allowed 9 yards per play folks. NINE. That is unreal high. Yes I am happy we forced turnovers. I get it, but a really tough thing to rely on. Yes we did ok in spots. And yes at the end of the day we did allow 3 points over 3 quarters. Ok great too. But alot of this is window dressing to a degree. I know its a team game, and as it should be....but the D can't allow this type of chunks on a per play basis. It just can't. Its a horrible number....and yes I get points is the ultimate measure...but again, our Offense was by far the better defense yesterday than the defense
Your concerns are very real. My feelings about the D has not changed. We are what we are. I do believe we are getting better each week but for us to be successful we will have to play keep away from every team we play. I know PJ feels this way. We just beat a team with 21 four and 4 five star players on their roster. I have never seen a team keep the ball for 40 minutes. Ted should being kissing on PJ as we speak!I agree with @AE 87. These D stats are way misleading.
They d statistically appeared good because we hogged the ball on O. It just is a fact
The D allowed 9 yards per play folks. NINE. That is unreal high. Yes I am happy we forced turnovers. I get it, but a really tough thing to rely on. Yes we did ok in spots. And yes at the end of the day we did allow 3 points over 3 quarters. Ok great too. But alot of this is window dressing to a degree. I know its a team game, and as it should be....but the D can't allow this type of chunks on a per play basis. It just can't. Its a horrible number....and yes I get points is the ultimate measure...but again, our Offense was by far the better defense yesterday than the defense
I wondered why they rested him so much between plays. I think that they were protecting him for fear that if he got tired he might aggravate his old injury. They certainly treated him more like a thoroughbred than a work horse.Thats what i told my wife last night, that if i was his O coord that i would either handoff or pass him the ball every fraking play possible lol
He actually expressed that philosophy (not in those words of course) when he was coaching at Penn State.I am starting to think Roof is a bit of a mad genius. It almost feels like there is a stretch of soft play sucking the QBs in to expecting something then sudden scheme or alignment change and pow! Get a big play interception/sack. Obviously, that is unintentional and just the "feel" I get but the big plays our defense has been able to come up with seem to so routinely be at critical points that it practically seems planned that way.