I don’t disagree, maybe throw in A&M as a pretty good team that seems on the rise too. But i don’t care about the sec, The point i am looking at is that the ACC is ripe for GT to make hay in when (hopefully) we get the team recruited with better talent, and a couple of Collins classes have become upperclassmen and
that the coaching is up to task. We should start winning a helluva lot of games. We have one dominant team in our conf., not 4-5.
Ahh
If that's your standard , then the sec has only AL and UGa.I don’t disagree, maybe throw in A&M as a pretty good team that seems on the rise too. But i don’t care about the sec, The point i am looking at is that the ACC is ripe for GT to make hay in when (hopefully) we get the team recruited with better talent, and a couple of Collins classes have become upperclassmen and
We need to get more top shelf talent to change that perception. First year we got it with Gibbs and Brooks. Since then the only Rivals top 250 player we have gotten is Jaron Willis this year and we may be in a battle to hang on to him. Several ACC and SEC teams are getting multiple to many of these guys every year. We need to start winning so we can jump into that game.
Whatever
It reminds me of the old Big 8... "Oklahoma and the Seven Dwarfs" Clemson is miles ahead of everyone else. Miami can't catch them, UNC can't, it is a one team show. As for Tech, we remain sort of middling to near the bottom according to these coaches, if you read between the lines but ahead of Duke, Syracuse and perhaps Louisville, NC State and Virginia Tech so its not all that bad. Coach Collins is nowhere near being on the hot seat that Satterfield at Louisville, Fuentes at Virginia Tech, and Cut is at Duke. Can't really find fault with these observations. The comments about the defense were the most disturbing. Two comments about "falling apart" and one about a "train wreck" which were pretty much how a lot of people saw it. It is a shame we are not playing Louisville, Syracuse and maybe NC State this year.
ACC Coaches Talk Anonymously About Conference Foes for 2021
ACC football coaches talk off-the-field about teams for the 2021 season.athlonsports.com
That is pretty much spot on with emphasis on "marginal" for NC State. I thought though that the comments were pretty respectful of the job being done at BC and Wake. More and more, I appreciate how smart Jimbo Fisher was to leave FSU because it is a mess right now even with the talent they have.
I don't think Narduzzi (spelling?) is the kind of guy other coaches are going to either respect or like. He is who he is and his team plays off that personality.
The ACC is decidedly top heavy at the moment with one dominant team, a couple of very good but not elite teams, a couple of talented but underachieving teams and then there is everyone else. The question is who is going to break away from the pack? It could be Tech or just about anyone. The article seems to be saying that BC is one team about to take a step forward and one magazine I read stated that they were the pick to be the "sleeper team" in the ACC this year FWIW.I don’t disagree, maybe throw in A&M as a pretty good team that seems on the rise too. But i don’t care about the sec, The point i am looking at is that the ACC is ripe for GT to make hay in when (hopefully) we get the team recruited with better talent, and a couple of Collins classes have become upperclassmen and
That's possible but it is also possible that the coaches could not resist commenting about rivals and slanting things to suit their own agenda. I wonder if they are being paid to comment?
Probably just Grad assistant’s commenting
I was thinking that or some low level analysts honestly.
I am not very encouraged.ACC Coaches Talk Anonymously About Conference Foes for 2021
ACC football coaches talk off-the-field about teams for the 2021 season.
If it was Steven Godfrey, he's great.
So you are saying we are going to create classes for football players like UNC. We will never approach their level, we haven't in 20 years. What we can do is out coach them....maybe.