OldJacketFan
Helluva Engineer
- Messages
- 8,348
- Location
- Nashville, TN
Can we critique the Abacks who constantly whiffed the lead block?
Been far too much of that this year unfortunately
Can we critique the Abacks who constantly whiffed the lead block?
It's funny. I think Cottrell is the fastest of the ABs. Searcy is more slippery and just about as fast. Lynch is smart and instinctive. Green is the strongest. I enjoy them all but they are all different.
Completely agree but Nathan has been head and shoulders over the other when it comes to getting the CB tied up or on the ground in my eye
I agree, but Cottrell simply can't make anyone miss. And he can't turn the corner quick enough (because he can't change direction fast enough) to be dangerous on sweeps. In my opinion he hurts our offense when the ball is in his hands. If he ever learns how to plant and turn upfield quickly, he is going to be dangerous. But right now he is tackled in a 1v1 situation far too often.
Go right ahead.Can we critique the Abacks who constantly whiffed the lead block?
Also, TQM is struggling with the passing game right now. Missed a wide open JJ Green in the endzone last night. And yes, I know he was getting pressured, but he knew what the route was and is responsible for recognizing he's wide open and getting it to him. He's also just way off in the deep seam routes too. Passes too flat and either over or underthrowing. Last night is a reality check that TQM has made it on one skill this year, his running ability. When a team like Clemson cuts that off, his weaknesses are exposed.
I don't think that was an issue of ability, but nerves. I think he just lost his composure. I would've liked to see some easy passes (eg: smoke route) to help him get settled.
Bingo! I don't think this was for lack of effort, however; it's hard to throw blocks when your feet keep sliding out from under you.Perimeter and downfield blocking was atrocious last night, btw.
Agree, but it's kinda hard when a guy is in your face when trying to make the first read. It was like 2 guys were in the backfield at the snap.Today isn't the day to be critiquing the A-backs. When the QB misses the first read, the DE has the QB and the pitch key has the A back regardless of how well everyone blocks. There's no numbers advantage when you miss the first read.
No doubt, and I think that's why coach told him to give when that happens. On the play where he got bent over backwards he absolutely had 2 guys in the backfield. I was just trying to say that when the unblocked DE is in the QBs face, the TO is dead no matter how well we block outside. I rewatched the first half the other night specifically looking for TO plays where the A back missing a block was the primary reason the play failed. I saw one - on the second series, pitch to CL and the lead didn't get his guy. He hit him, but didn't take him out, and the defender made the tackle. There was one other play where there were FOUR defenders flooding the alley and the lead A didn't block any of them but there's no way that play was going anywhere.Agree, but it's kinda hard when a guy is in your face when trying to make the first read. It was like 2 guys were in the backfield at the snap.
Exactly. Without numbers it's no gain. With numbers but a missed block by the lead A and it's minimal gain. Get the lead block and it's 6-10 yards most of the time. Robbie might be the only A we've had that could split 2 guys and make them both miss.The outside run game requires a numbers advantage. Even with one extra guys in space, it's extremely difficult to get by him because of the angles involved. We are running East/West while they are attacking at an angle. It's much harder to juke on this angle. A straight line heads up defender is much easier to make miss. Clemson not only had one, but two unblocked defenders waiting on our pitchman much of the time. Some of you guys wanted TM to pitch into that.