First off, we were upset last year, but this is apples and oranges. Let’s look at the results:
1. Clemson - both teams lost to Clemson. Last year’s team lost to the eventual National Champion and we may say the same thing about this year’s team at the end of the year. Pretty much a wash. Two bad losses, but expected.
2. Wins- last year’s team opened with a win against Alcorn State. Not very impressive. This year’s team beat USF in a tight battle. Sloppy on offense, but a win is a win. I’ll give the edge to this year’s team.
3. Losses- Here’s where we get to the big difference. Against Pitt and USF we were competitive(we had the USF game won until Searcy’s fumble). We didn’t even compete with Temple, with offense being shut out for the first time in over 30 years. The Citadel loss speaks for itself, but if you’re not going to give last year’s team much credit for beating Alcorn State(and I didn’t), that means a loss to The Citadel is even that much worse. A lot of people consider it the worst loss in our history and the stats prove that that isn’t hyperbole. Last year’s team gets a huge edge here. They lost to two FBS teams in competitive games. This year’s team didn’t even lead against Temple or FCS’s The Citadel.
Our last two losses were the first of their kind in thirty years. That’s the difference.
Lastly, as I said earlier, we were upset last year and a lot of people were already in meltdown mode. However, I will add that it’s much more reasonable to say “ give it to time, we’ll turn this around” when your team lost in competitive fashion and your coach has won you a couple division titles and a conference title in the past versus when you lose to an FCS team and your coach hasn’t had any significant success in his head coaching career yet.