I haven't looked back to find posts, but didn't you say before that people shouldn't be negative until the end of the season or until a change was made? Now you ask that no negative discussion be allowed after the change was made?
While I agree that simply bashing Collins doesn't make for good discussion:
- The events happened only four days ago. When big news happens, it is very difficult to keep it out of people's minds.
- There will be changes made. Do you not think it is a valid discussion to compare practice, accountability, starters, playing time, etc between the Collins led team and the Key led team?
- There is certain to be some discussion about whether the team is better off now than when Collins took over as HC. I think that is very normal after leadership change, and I think in this case Collins actually invited it with negative comments about previous eras in GT football when he took over.
- Discussions about new HC candidates are inevitably going to include comparisons to previous coaches. People want quality X like coach Y had, etc.
As I said, simply bashing and calling names doesn't make for interesting conversation. However, there is plenty that can be reasonably discussed about the Collins era. Remember the saying - if you don't know history you're doomed to repeat it. If you are concerned that recruits will see all this negativity, this is probably the least negative and least vulgar GT forum available. Some other forums are very negative and very vulgar. Twitter and Instagram, which are probably looked at more by recruits, are absolute cesspools. If you want to be on a site that only allows "rah rah go team" type posts, good luck finding people to join you in such discussions.