Well, it’s a clue that we aren’t Louisville
Fair enough
Well, it’s a clue that we aren’t Louisville
What was your source for this data. I love it!My first thought was that you were right, but I don’t see it in the lineup breakdown
View attachment 15353
I thinnk you & I are in agreement. I want Ndongo to be more consistent. At times he is not playing under control. That 100% his youth showing out. I like George and agree he is a better player, but Kyle is a steady PG who knows how to keep the game in front of him.My early season impressions of Claude are that he is fine against mid-major front courts but is physically overmatched against high major talent. He is not quite big enough or explosive enough against high major bigs. He's serviceable on the boards but I don't think he is a scorer at the ACC level. I haven't seen a ton of him yet but my guess is that his role wanes the deeper into the schedule we go, Ndongo being the more talented option.
Any "Best" lineup that doesn't include George is a big "Huh?" to me. Sturdivant, in my book, is a proven, 5th year Senior below average ACC guard. He has some scoring skills and is a useful back-up, but he simply does not make the players around him better for a PG. On offense, he has a "hitch" or hesitation to his game that puts the offense out of sync. He is a well below average defender. As a player he reacts and does not anticipate. I like him better off the ball. Maybe some switch will click, but it is awfully late in his career for that.
Agree that it would be good to get Terry back, assuming he can pick-up where he left off last year. Abram is one to watch. Can Stoudamire break the wild stallion and turn him into a team player?
I thinnk you & I are in agreement. I want Ndongo to be more consistent. At times he is not playing under control. That 100% his youth showing out. I like George and agree he is a better player, but Kyle is a steady PG who knows how to keep the game in front of him.
These are good problems.
Rk | Player | G | GS | PER | TS% | eFG% | WS | WS/40 | OBPM | DBPM | BPMV |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Emmer Nichols | 2 | 0 | 22.4 | 0.0 | .232 | 4.5 | 1.2 | 5.8 | ||
2 | Kowacie Reeves | 8 | 8 | 18.2 | .629 | .572 | 1.1 | .168 | 3.4 | 2.1 | 5.6 |
3 | Baye Ndongo | 5 | 5 | 16.7 | .458 | .451 | 0.2 | .057 | -2.2 | 5.4 | 3.2 |
4 | Carter Murphy | 5 | 0 | 10.5 | .600 | .600 | 0.1 | .133 | -0.7 | 3.3 | 2.5 |
5 | Dallan Coleman | 8 | 0 | 13.6 | .544 | .528 | 0.7 | .138 | 0.8 | 1.6 | 2.4 |
6 | Miles Kelly | 8 | 8 | 15.9 | .466 | .415 | 0.7 | .117 | 1.8 | 0.1 | 1.9 |
7 | Tyzhaun Claude | 8 | 4 | 19.1 | .482 | .459 | 0.6 | .154 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 1.5 |
8 | Kyle Sturdivant | 8 | 0 | 14.3 | .504 | .449 | 0.4 | .119 | -1.3 | 0.7 | -0.6 |
9 | Ibrahima Sacko | 8 | 0 | 10.2 | .437 | .500 | 0.2 | .080 | -4.3 | 3.5 | -0.9 |
10 | Ebenezer Dowuona | 8 | 4 | 7.2 | .670 | .750 | 0.1 | .053 | -4.3 | 1.9 | -2.4 |
11 | Tafara Gapare | 5 | 3 | 8.3 | .398 | .395 | 0.1 | .040 | -7.1 | 4.4 | -2.7 |
12 | Naithan George | 5 | 4 | 5.0 | .380 | .368 | 0.0 | .010 | -4.1 | 0.2 | -3.9 |
13 | Amaree Abram | 5 | 4 | 4.6 | .376 | .333 | 0.0 | -.002 | -7.0 | -0.9 | -7.9 |
14 | Marcos San Miguel | 1 | 0 | -49.7 | .000 | .000 | 0.0 | -.966 | -38.6 | -28.0 | -66.6 |
Agree with all. Terry will take several weeks to find a rhythm after he is cleared. Foot injuries that have lingered for months really impact BB players.My early season impressions of Claude are that he is fine against mid-major front courts but is physically overmatched against high major talent. He is not quite big enough or explosive enough against high major bigs. He's serviceable on the boards but I don't think he is a scorer at the ACC level. I haven't seen a ton of him yet but my guess is that his role wanes the deeper into the schedule we go, Ndongo being the more talented option.
Any "Best" lineup that doesn't include George is a big "Huh?" to me. Sturdivant, in my book, is a proven, 5th year Senior below average ACC guard. He has some scoring skills and is a useful back-up, but he simply does not make the players around him better for a PG. On offense, he has a "hitch" or hesitation to his game that puts the offense out of sync. He is a well below average defender. As a player he reacts and does not anticipate. I like him better off the ball. Maybe some switch will click, but it is awfully late in his career for that.
Agree that it would be good to get Terry back, assuming he can pick-up where he left off last year. Abram is one to watch. Can Stoudamire break the wild stallion and turn him into a team player?
The “Final Stats (PDF)” link on the game stories or schedule on ramblinwreck.com. It’s usually a 20+ page document including play by play, stats by half, team shooting charts, etc. Really good stuff.What was your source for this data. I love it!
I would like to Ndongo at the 5, Claude at the 4, Kapare at the 3, George at the 2, and Kelly at the 2My early season impressions of Claude are that he is fine against mid-major front courts but is physically overmatched against high major talent. He is not quite big enough or explosive enough against high major bigs. He's serviceable on the boards but I don't think he is a scorer at the ACC level. I haven't seen a ton of him yet but my guess is that his role wanes the deeper into the schedule we go, Ndongo being the more talented option.
Any "Best" lineup that doesn't include George is a big "Huh?" to me. Sturdivant, in my book, is a proven, 5th year Senior below average ACC guard. He has some scoring skills and is a useful back-up, but he simply does not make the players around him better for a PG. On offense, he has a "hitch" or hesitation to his game that puts the offense out of sync. He is a well below average defender. As a player he reacts and does not anticipate. I like him better off the ball. Maybe some switch will click, but it is awfully late in his career for that.
Agree that it would be good to get Terry back, assuming he can pick-up where he left off last year. Abram is one to watch. Can Stoudamire break the wild stallion and turn him into a team player?
I think you meant George at the 1. And Claude can’t play the 4 in a spread offense.I would like to Ndongo at the 5, Claude at the 4, Kapare at the 3, George at the 2, and Kelly at the 2
Yes I meant George at the 1I think you meant George at the 1. And Claude can’t play the 4 in a spread offense.
And I don't see how you can leave Reeves out. He is our most consistent and productive player we have.I would like to Ndongo at the 5, Claude at the 4, Kapare at the 3, George at the 2, and Kelly at the 2
I barely made it through statistics at Tech, but I do know that in the 1969 through the 1971seasons , without three pointers nor a 30 second clock, we shot over 50% from the field and averaged over 80 points per game, with a 40-19 record and two post season tournaments. I am not a big fan of three-point shooting as many fans are, but we did take a very few shots from 22 ft 1 3/4 inches. If we missed a couple, we joined the water boy on the bench. Our offense was not built around three pointers.That isn't how variance works. You need more than just the mean to determine that.
Taking each game as an individual data point (which yes has it's own issues but it's the quickest way to get a decent picture) we get the following for our team this year
for 2 point our fg% average is 47.15% with a standard deviation of 10.4.
for 3 point our fg% average is 29.325% with a standard deviation of 6.88.
So for our team we have significantly less variance in our 3point shooting than our 2 point shooting. Now you could go further and account for 3s being worth 50% more than twos which would make a swing in 3% account for a bigger swing in points than 2s, but we also shoot about 50% more twos than we do threes which would make the 2fg% swing have a bigger swing in baskets made meaning a bigger swing in points. Without actually looking at it more closely I'm tempted to just stick with the above and say our variance on 3 point shooting is less than that of our 2 fg% right now.
Another pro-style new coach is trying this style offense at Georgia Southern now and they are 0-11. I hope it works out for us.All the analytics are nice but recognize that CDS is committed to a spread offense focused on ball movement and 3 point shots. Hang on for the ride
I was in school at Tech during that period. As I remember it, the best way to keep our FG % high was just to get the ball to Yunkus!I barely made it through statistics at Tech, but I do know that in the 1969 through the 1971seasons , without three pointers nor a 30 second clock, we shot over 50% from the field and averaged over 80 points per game, with a 40-19 record and two post season tournaments. I am not a big fan of three-point shooting as many fans are, but we did take a very few shots from 22 ft 1 3/4 inches. If we missed a couple, we joined the water boy on the bench. Our offense was not built around three pointers.
Yes, that was it. Lots of us high scoring guards were humbled but we won , and all graduated!!!I was in school at Tech during that period. As I remember it, the best way to keep our FG % high was just to get the ball to Yunkus!
In the 1969-70 season, Rich averaged 56% from the field and dunking was not allowed. Deadly from 18 ft in and averaged 12 rebounds and 30 points per game, against strongest strength of schedule in our 3 years varsity. All American academically and athletically, and drafted 38th in the NBA by the Cincinnati Royals.Yes, that was it. Lots of us high scoring guards were humbled but we won , and all graduated!!!