Search results

We’ll win some games and we’ll lose some games. ;)

Wait... I thought our Pres brought all the manufacturing back to the US???

The Coastal has been no where near the worst division in college football over the past decade. That’s just plain ridiculous!

6 of the top 10 SEC. Must be that ol’ SEC speed!

New Unis:

Matching schemes to players means squat if you can’t block.

No.

Thanks. I’m just curious as to the methodology because I’ve never heard of one for ranking an entire team of 85+ players regardless of position especially in an era of increasing speciality. As far as getting lost in the weeds goes, I bet if any of you had a boss tell you your salary depends...

So you are not the least bit curious about their evaluation criteria? On top of that you think anybody who is curious is negative towards the program. Nice. All I’m looking for is a little bit more information on their methodology. I’m not trolling anybody. By the way, I’m not the only one on...

“Hey Percy you rank... mmm...say... mmm... numberrrrrrrr... 15 and Tariq you are number 16, no wait... 17.” “Why coach?” “because Percy’s leg is moving faster when he kicks the ball than ‘riq’s legs are moving when he’s tackling somebody OK? Now shut up and go be relentlessly elite!”

BS. They explain a whole Lotta stuff to the fans and they go into great detail on some things.

You gave no theory, you said points. Points based on what? How are the points earned by a linebacker equivalent to the points earned by a place kicker? Now you’re saying everybody knows who’s good and who’s not. That sounds very subjective to me. In fact it sounds like a depth chart. My take...

I know, this is a super fishy thing, but some don’t want to recognize it as such.

I don’t know if I understand the criteria or not because I don’t know what it is, nobody does. I’m not one to blindly accept something, maybe you are. This is what message boards are for ... discussion. I’m not trying to convince the coaches of anything. I’m trying to understand the details...

So that makes a little sense, but without knowing the criteria and how that equates to a whole team ranking, the validity is questionable at best. My guess is it’s mostly eyeball and gut, not so much objective analysis/data comparison. I don’t get at all why you want 40+ people doing the...

I misunderstood you, sorry.

What are you talking about? I’m not opposed to ranking them, there’s just no way to do it accurately. What criteria do you use across the board as a basis for comparison? Each position has a very specific and different skill set.

This struck me as odd as well. How do you even rank one position vs another? How would you rank the punter and kickers relative to the DB's and LB's relative to the receivers and OL? How could you possibly compare relative worth to the team and then you have everybody with various levels of...

I prefer melted provolone on my cheese steak.

I wonder if he would ever want to be the play-by-play guy so we could say goodbye the growler?