Search results

Wow. That is a completely unsupportable statement, but I guess we will disagree.

Just to be clear, you think Citadel has more talent on the O line than GT?

There is a time and place for dancing. Anyone remember our VT upset in 2010? Sidelines were definitely dancing that night. Losing to the Citadel is not the time to be dancing.

I actually think he survives the losses no problem, if he looks like he knows what he is doing. The perception of the TO is that it killed GT football. I don’t agree with that, but CGC can lean into that. But he can’t lose games the way we lost to citadel, where it is clear he had no idea what...

So you think citadel has more talent on their OL and DL than we do?

Still not really sure what you are asking me? But I’m giving team a pass on D. I thought we looked real bad, and had their QB not went down, we don’t even get to OT. But given we have shown improvements in games vs USF and even Clemson, technique wise and scheme wise, I chalk this up to 3O and...

Not sure I understand.

Coaches are compensated well. If they can’t figure out against Citadel, then that’s the problem.

Commit to something. Stop trying to do everything.

The complaint post Clemson is get an identity. The complaint now is the same thing. We have no gameplan.

The positive in this is that we didn’t hire CGC for his offensive prowess. Hopefully he does the right thing and gets a real coordinator.

Given how few we have scored in total probably would not take long to figure this out.

So are you trying to say recruiting is what caused us to lose against Citadel? It’s a straight forward question.

I don’t understand what you are talking about. My question you was is recruiting what caused us to lose to the citadel. I’ll agree that it probably was the reason we have lost to UGA, if that’s what you are asking.

Seriously? Recruiting is why we lost to citadel? Ok.

In hindsight maybe we should’ve called the swinging gate play again.

Lol. Not really addressing my point but whatever. Look, I get that we are going to go through a transition. No one expects us to win 10 games. We do want an identity and something to suggest the coaches know what they are doing. Calling the swinging play when you need a big play is not that.

I'm pretty sure football game attendance is not high on the list of criteria that determine whether we admit legacies, but by your dumb logic we should not admit anyone that is going to join a frat. Nothing worse than empty seats until the second quarter.

I don’t buy this. Prior regime converted a TE to an OL and used a walk on center. And this was under the guidance of Sewak, who everyone seems to think was terrible. Yet here we have supposedly the best OL coach in the business and he can’t work with OL enough to get us time to throw against the...

This is the issue. Also, I take issue with the constant criticism of our OL and QB by others as an excuse. Are they on par with Clemson or UGA? No. But they are undoubtedly better than a lot of teams we play and a lot of teams that have some semblance of an O strategy and game plan. The...