Search results

It’s a fair question. I think the answer (for me, at least) is yes, simply because there’s not the same indignity in losing to USF as the Citadel. In retrospect, USF is awful, and it would be a really bad loss. But I left the stadium after the Citadel just blown away. And I guess backing...

I guess my point was that they were on the back end of their run, and it was the first crack in the foundation that we saw. They’re still dealing with it today. Plus, the ACC wasn’t great then. UVA has certainly improved, but I’m not sure they’re that much better or if the rest of the...

I think we should have because it’s likely the last one for the season (though maybe we pick off VT after it’s clear they’re firing their coach).

Hope everyone enjoyed it!

On the contrary, I think VT losing to JMU was a sign of things to come for them. And I’m not sure UVA is the standard by which we should measure ourselves. And if it is, that’s telling in itself.

And just like that, it’s gone from a season or two to maybe five years. Parkinson’s Law, ladies and gentlemen.

Yes, Mr. I’m Expecting An Offensive Explosion Versus South Florida.

I understand completely where you’re coming from, and I largely agree. I said before the season 2-10 was about where we’d finish, with a ceiling of 4-8. I’m not upset about losing to Carolina or Duke or Temple. I expected that. But the Citadel was stunning to me in a way that is hard to...

Losing gimmes is spending money! That’s a helluva concept.

Losing gimmes is a unique way of elevating the program. Plus, I thought we weren’t supposed to trash the players. Guess it’s okay, after all.

Y’know, you’re right. It’s to win games, and he’s not doing that, either.

That’s literally his job.

If you’re comfortable having smoke blown up your a—, that’s your business.

I’m not basing it on five games. I’m basing it on one game. The Citadel was inexcusable.

JFC. I didn’t say a word about the option. I simply quoted our coach saying he’d run an offense befitting the skills of our players. If all they can do is the option, then he should run that, or he should not have said what he said. Period.

Okay.

This is a whole mess of logical fallacies. Think we’ve got tu quoque, moving the goal posts, maybe more. If you thought that was, and presumably you do, then it’s not clear why you wouldn’t think Collins was. You also find it awfully easy to ignore other available information.

I don’t. That’s the point.

"The players that we have, we will fit the scheme based on the talents we have on our roster.” I dunno, maybe ask the guy who said this. https://929thegame.radio.com/articles/head-coach-geoff-collins-breaks-down-what-georgia-techs-new-offense-will-look