Search results

Reality Louisville - we should have won the game. Up 15 at halftime to a team that is not superior to us. Nevertheless, we scored 34 and played well at times against a decent team. I still look back at it as a game our coaches let slip away depite some nice play calling early. Ole Miss -...

Too much talk about undefeated teams. My bet is that there are no undefeated teams after conference championships. I have yet to see a dominate team. Not even the dawgs. Best chance for undefeated is Ohio St - Michigan winner but don't even see that.

Someone mentioned Domineck Colorado but also Ivey MIssissippi who both would have helped our dline tremendously. Iguess that you are going to lose some.

I'm pulling for them too but I was surprised Thacker stayed on with a change of regime - he has to be on a short leash. I do think the 2024 recruits on the defensive line, assuming they do sign, can not get here fast enough. Thw DL did nothing in the game.

UNC money is poverty to middle class citizen to Stanford money and prestige. UNC is not in their league.

Interesting ..... didn't they just chastise FSU for their barking being detrimental to the conference and uncalled for? Couldn't they have just kept quiet or better yet accepted their fate with a "Yes" vote? Are they two-faced? UUUUUUH yeah!!!!!!

I hate this. Just stupid. So not bringing them on is going to solve the income disparity? ACC will regret not taking 3 fine institutions someday. FSU and UNC can go ......... themselves.

it will be changed

yeah and by then Dabbo will have left to coach his alma mater. FSU will realized maybe they aren't quite as great as they currently think they are, UNC will continue to win some and lose some and the best team in the conference will be Miami with GA Tech and Va Tech battling them.

If you had told me two years ago that the PAC12 was going to implode and be split up between the existing conferences, Stanford would have been one of the teams I would have wanted for the ACC. USC of course too but you don't always get what you want. I also like Cal over Colorado and the 3...

There QB is very good. Clemson's is ok.

wow - i knew it was bad but didn't know that bad of a difference

Now that there is funny - I don't care who you are!!!!!!

i got it off a website - not sure of accuracy but here is the link - i can't say to its accuracy. https://accfootballrx.blogspot.com/2023/02/most-watched-2022-cfb-teams.html BTW I ran the numbers ssuming 50 max 27 low and it looked better 1 clemson 50 2 fsu 50 3 ncst 33 4 unc 32 5...

at some point schools could be better off taking haircut but I here you - 50 max and 37 low might be better numbers

just playing with fsu arguments of payouts based on viewership, I used medium.com viewership by week and arbitrarily said no school gets more than 60 or less than 20 million per year. Here is how it came out. We may be headed to this type arrangement. 1 clemson 60 2 fsu 60 3 ncst 38 4...

did he really say that? His other responsibility was to assure ethical behavior of his senior staffers - he didn't do that. I blame him for some of our current issues. I think the new President is doing a good job.

This sounds accurate. My guess, and only a guess, is the BIG12 will add 3 (probably Arizona, Washington and Oregon). The ACC stands pat as well as the other conferences. PAC is left with Stanford, Cal, Oregon St, Washington St, Arizona St, Utah and add San Diego St, Boise St. UNLV, Wyoming -...

That may well be true. I was thinking longer term when the next agreement is made.

I really don't have an opinion. I just think it will happen. How it affects us is probably negatively but it is going to happen. I think it would be better if it was variable.