Search results

I thought that Graham looked pretty competent in his limited time out there. Not sure why we didn't see more of LJ and less of TO.

Graham looked decent there. Play him the rest of the game.

Why no Graham or LJ at this point?

yeah I don't get it. I've seen lots of TO QB Keepers. It's like 2018 all over again, which isn't a good thing.

Am hoping that playing such a fast, big team translates to a 3-1 start. Not sure I'm a fan of the starting QB though. Thought we were going to pass it more, which makes tonight's starter a strange one.

I'm done with this game. I don't want to get banned.

We are in deep trouble if Oliver is the best we can do at starting QB. 12 Keepers is a ****ty offense to run.

I think it's dependent on game scenario. 4th & 2 on our 35, 1st qtr down 3-0? Punt. Same down and distance, 4th qtr down 24? Go for it. This game needs to be a good test of all 3 phases of our game and it should be. Just having a new routine for Punt Team (etc etc) and having gametime...

2015 + 2017 = three seasons? Bradley's a crappy writer, sorry.

oops you're right. I misread that but yeah, a rise in the spread means money coming in more on the favorite. Which is stupid - we'll cover this

If Bama's basket-weaving OL majors can do this, our guys should excel at it.

Actually, this means more $$$ is coming in on our side.

Exactly. They could blow us out 51-17 and we still cover. I think the game will be an easy Clemson win in the 20s, which is an easy cover for us.

point to where I "denigrated the last 11 years". It's these types of over-the-top exaggerations that hurt your credibility and make you appear to be offended. And there are absolutely a few fans in this forum who are NOT enthusiastic about Coach Collins, which is fine btw but to pretend...

Looks like Key's got them reading the defense pre-snap, which apparently is a new development. FTA: I personally like the trial-by-fire the OL will get on Thursday. It'll make the 3 games after that seem smaller and slower by comparison.

Watching the games showed that the scheme wasn't an equalizer either. Watching us lose to Duke 4 of 5 years is evidence enough for the vast majority of football fans. Though you're right - D and ST are 2 of the 3 phases of the game, all of which are under the umbrella of the HC. But again...

somehow, I'm not feeling the concern :ROFLMAO: And I called your response childish, not you. Reading comp fail? I've not spoken of PJ and the staff in many a moon. This article does make clear that, at least on the OL side of things, the current staff is a VAST improvement over the former...

LOL - always with the childish little personal shots! What is it with some of PJ's fans that causes you to take such great offense on the guy's behalf? Anyway, the argument for PJ's scheme was always that it was an equalizer for us and our lack of elite talent. The overall record shows that...

I was definitely ready for a change, as were most fans it seems, given the amount of $$$ now coming into the program and the increase in season tickets and overall interest. I have no agenda for any coach. They're all being paid millions and will be fine regardless of how they do, PJ...

I don't think anyone's criticism is aimed towards any previous coach except Sewak, a coach that literally got zero praise from any GT fan in any forum I've watched over the years. From the article itself, it's clear the kids are doing things they previously thought weren't possible under the...