I agree recruits like this stuff. I also think they respond well to "winning" teams or programs that are on the upswing. We have been on a lull for the last 4 seasons imo. We desperately need to start winning on the field and then the recruits will come. But staying with your topic we do...
I appreciate this DCS. I think you make all good points. Its easy to get enthralled in a heated debate and lose sight of the fact that not all are going to see eye to eye on topics no matter how long you debate it. You can't make someone think just like you. Its also easy as well to...
I would love it just fine. The offense itself is not the "problem" - on the field. The execution is.
But I will say that the "Triple Option" offense as many incorrectly label it, creates negative stigma for itself. Unfortunately.
However, any offense whether it be option based, I-Form...
I love the triple option as well. I do not love our offense... jmo
The triple option is so deadly and hard to stop when executed correctly.
Our offense's poor blocking and Vad's inability to make correct reads have dulled the enjoyment of this play - that is art in motion when executed...
When Brian Bohannon was here he made the comment that VL had a knack for passing the football. The timing he had was a natural gift. In HS, Vad's passing statistics were indicative of a passing QB versus a scrambling QB.
I am simply saying Vad would be better suited for a passing concept...
No. What I am saying is this is not a passing offensive scheme. A passing QB (i.e. VL) would be more successful in a scheme that is built around the passing game.
Actually Jemea was playing the nickel most of the time and Lou Young was the CB opposite DJ. Either way you are correct it will be interesting to see who steps up on that side. And I also would like to see more bump and run as well, sir.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.