Search results

The stats that are available have FCS and Syracuse stats in them, so that doesn't tell the real story of consistency. Those great rushing stats have still not gotten us over the .500 Mark against FBS teams and especially vs Va Tech, Miami, Clemson, and UGA.

If you think that defenses are playing us the same way they did the first 2 years, you are mistaken. We are sub .500 over the past 4 seasons vs FBS teams. I don't see that as reason to keep doing the same old things. Got to make changes to improve.

It's not like we added a whole new play book. We added a diamond formation with 3 plays. That's far less formations and plays than any other team in the country, who already have much thicker play books. I don't buy that adding one new formation was to blame for the offensive problems. No way.

I used to use hand signals when I was coaching. The key is to have dummy calls. If you are still worried about getting picked you have 2 people by you, with one giving the call and 2 faking it. A team may have been able to decipher the formation from me, but not the play. Could care less if...

I really don't know what to think about Duke moving forward. Yes they've improved, but I really don't see them as a threat. I think they match up well vs Va Tech and Miami, but besides that I don't think they are a concern or anything to worry about. Texas A&M had a terrible defense and...

Not trying to dispute strength of schedule. Just stating a fact about CPJ vs Air Force and Middle Tennessee State. Carry on.

The comment was made that CPJ would have been sent packing if he lost to more than 1 of those teams. I just stated a fact. Sorry if the fact I stated upset you.

I see 2 teams on that schedule that beat CPJ last time he played them.

Bet money that Gurley struggles this year through injury, scheme, or both. Teams will elect to go low on him, and the passing threat is not that prevalent. Will probably see some 8 man fronts, although it will most likely be post snap 8 man fronts (sneaking safeties up).

My biggest concern is that defenses attack us now. Look back at how UGA slow played their front 7. Slow playing was the conventional way to defend the wishbone back in the day. We tore that up. Defenses have changed tactics and have been attacking us here lately and it's made a difference...

Agree Squints. Nothing personal, we just disagree on this issue. I may disagree, but I do respect your opinion.

Always enjoyed tailgating with the Clemson fans. Sat next to them at games and have had a good time as well. Not obnoxious like dawg fans, but very passionate. I do pull for Baylor as my dad went to school there. Been a huge Art Briles fan since he was at Houston, so now it's just icing on...

Really like Gamble. Big frame, should be able to hold up to 315 comfortably, not sure why he is staying in the 270-280 range. I see him as a 3 tech, but think he can work at NG just fine (thought the same about Gotsis last year, now it looks like he is at a 3 tech) As for Stargell, I'll wait to...

He needs to be at least 225. He can get there but will lose speed, quickness, and agility. Look Leggett can be a temporary fill in since Custis is gone, but making him a full time B back will not be putting him in the best position to succeed. It's simply wishful thinking to suggest otherwise.

The taller you are the more weight you can comfortably carry.

That was at the FCS level and he is also 2 inches taller than Leggett.

Based on what?

Most as in 3-4 posters? Yeah got it.

Don't think Bback needs to be a bowling ball either. Was saying that he will be short and round if he puts on weight. Would rather see him be an Aback where he won't have to put on a ton more weight and can keep his speed. He's in the Roddy Jones range. No one would have said that Roddy...

One more time....By the time he puts on the necessary weight to take the punishment of the position he will look like a bowling ball, and will have lost his speed and agility. That's not hard to understand. Not sure why that bothers you so much. Move on!