Lets break down what you just said.
Au had 729 att vs GT 713 you are right, 16 more...16..
4596 vs 3891 16 more att for 705 more yards..
6.3 ypc vs 5.5
AU also threw for 727 more yards. and most importantly,
there "scheme" won the SEC and got them to the dance..
I, IMO, don't think the O is the primary blame. There are problem on D & ST as well that need to be addressed. Do I have the answers? No, I'm a banker not a coach.
please enlighten me.
nothing speaks louder than W's & L's. near misses don't count.
not what I said.
Colleges "pitch" kids on the O they run. They "market" the O to the kids. They tell kids, "we throw the ball in the spread" etc.. trust me , I know first hand.
If you don't think they do, what world do you live in???
8-4 is better than 7-6 any day of the week. and put up 40-50 pts per game.
you are comparing T A&M to a team that went 7-6 and struggled against mediocre D's in the country
T A&M was in the same boat last year. Horrible D but they could put up 50 pts per game and win by keeping the other O off the field. The D needs to step up, yes but so does the O, big time. 17-20 pts per game ain't gonna win many in today's game. Sometimes your best D is a good O.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.