Search results

Yep and see what they want to see.

Sorry man. I was keeping in line with his 2015 references. Yes you are correct. He said we were scoring at will on a top 25 D from 2015 (even tho that was last year). So a 3-9 team scoring at will on a top 25 D is impressive. I apologize.

I guess you have to try to look for something positive when you are 3-9 huh?

fixed it.

good

I don't dig into pts vs teams with 36 freshmen or less or 3rd % on Saturdays at 7:37 with a full moon in month of November. Unlike 90% of the people here I look at totals and not cherry pick inside those to fit my agenda. At he end of the day W's & L's is all that matters. Coaches are paid for...

I don't cherry pick stats. I prefer overall (total O or total D)

Also measured by W's & L's, although some people in here don't seem to think so.

:rolleyes:

That's what I saw. They could have hung 70 if they wanted to.

LOL! I love how they list him at 5'11.. He is 5'9 maybe. I am 5'10 and taller than him standing beside him.

28th overall and 33rd in Rushing defense...

LOL

yep.. spot on. Now the CPJ defenders will be out in full force asking questions on how you know we don't get a shot, blah blah blah.... I said the same thing 2 years ago and got roasted but it is simply the truth. Why in the world would a 4* WR come to GT and get 2 passes a game? 4*, 5* QBs...

lol

That's what I don't understand. They are clinging to 2014. 2014 was great, I enjoyed it. but that time and team are gone.

you replied to my 2014 comment. I quoted your vandy comment that we beat a pwr 5 school. I was pointing out they are not a very good pwr 5 school, which shows in the records of the years you pointed out. They can lead the league in D and have losses. W's & L's is what gets you paid. Not D stats.

I don't have time.. Some of us work lol..

I love how we cherry pick stats to fit an argument. Whopping 3-9 in 2014 and blistering 4-8 in 2015,. Yea, they are good..

whichever one produces W's.