Search results

Wrong. That’s good of you that you don’t do that though. I commend you on that.

What kind of proof would you need? Seems like your mind is already made up

If he played over Wesley, I can assure you that he earned it. It’s completely different than the last coaching staff that didn’t necessarily start or play the best players that could be put on the field.

It doesn’t really complicate things for the OL that much. So long as they’re doing the correct things (huddle, pre-snap reads, consistent and correct cadence, correct post snap reads) there’s really not that much difference between QBs for the OL.

What years didja play?

Paul Johnson ran the strength and conditioning program, not directly of course. It’s no wonder our guys were small and not strong. He had no idea what he was doing.

CPJ was not a good coach. Idk why this continues to be a debate. Pick whatever parameters you want.

What’s great is we have a staff that can draw from many systems and create their own system to build what best suits the players we have. I don’t think we will see the same exact offense year in and out. This is a good thing.

I heard from the man that the OL is doing very well, better than expected so far. Still have some bad habits to break.

Meh. There’s been a few 21s that didn’t do anything to earn it after Calvin.

:(

I wouldn’t question any player’s fanhood, simple joke about confusing Joe Ham for Errin Joe. As for the Bobby Ross about losing to Duke, I stand corrected. @Supersizethatorder-mutt But I remain steadfast about Ross not losing to Duke in 97,98,99 like you said

Maybe, but not as GTs head coach.

Yeah and didn’t lose to Duke.

Did you ever play for anyone other than CPJ?

LMGTLAO VamosJackets reveals he’s not as big of a GT fan as he thought.

My claim is what I posted. The other stuff, well, we can talk about it over some ribs/beer at Legends of The Flats.

Our past two coaches have had .580 and .579 winning percentages. That’s mediocre. My guess is that CGC does better than that for a few different reasons. Some of which we’ve seen already.

No you won’t ;-)

We can agree to disagree. I don’t think I’ve trashed him. I think I’ve given a pretty accurate account of the truth.