Eastman
Helluva Engineer
- Messages
- 1,289
- Location
- Columbia, SC
I chose the athlete because I think they are more fun to watch and have a higher upside. Although I loved watching Tevin run the offense, I still remember more of JT’s amazing plays.
But it wasn’t as open, as let’s say a Tevin. Atleast that’s what I would assume.Jt actually had a pretty open playbook in 2014 we just rarely had to run anything beyond inside veer
I prefer a QB that is big, not necessarily the best athlete on the team but a good athlete none the less. He must be proficient at reads, the mesh, and the pitch as well as an accurate and strong armed passer. When and if it it is necessary to run himself, he should be hard to bring down.
ruA happy go lucky, if you can't beat them you might as well join them attitude towards our most hated rival ( that's UGA for those that haven't figured out yet or have gone squishy) would be an automatic disqualifier.
A mediocre athlete was not one of the choices.A stellar athlete can gain experience. A mediocre athlete will lead to mediocre results regardless of experience.
A mediocre athlete was not one of the choices.
I'll take a Tevin Washington over a Vad Lee any day of the week.
Agree but I’d take JT over TW. And I mean JT in his 1st year against TW in his last year.A mediocre athlete was not one of the choices.
I'll take a Tevin Washington over a Vad Lee any day of the week.
If JT would have had the talent the 2008-2009 team had i think they would have went 13-1 in 2014Agree but I’d take JT over TW. And I mean JT in his 1st year against TW in his last year.
And this isn’t a hit on TW, imo he was a good player at GT.