forensicbuzz
21st Century Throwback Dad
- Messages
- 8,847
- Location
- North Shore, Chicago
I refuse to concede a game before it‘s played. 15-0
Are you mistaking “no set QB” for ~hard choice between two good QB’s~?I, reluctantly, voted for 5. The problem here is that it is a point estimate. 5 Is what the team's difficulties - no set QB, new O and OC, lost our DE difference maker - seems to fit best. But … if the predictions were put into "confidence intervals" (not real ones, just ranges) I would have voted for 5 - 7. If a few things tip our way, then I don't see any reason why we couldn't win 7. But luck will have to be on our side.
Let's hope it is.
Pyron is really overrated by the crew here. He’s no better than a middling ACC starting QB, at least as a true freshman. Decently accurate, decent playmaking ability, dedicated heart (too dedicated sometimes as you saw when he picked up his injury).Are you mistaking “no set QB” for ~hard choice between two good QB’s~?
Not trying to be rude but in case you didn’t know, there is one set as starter, Haynes King
No, I meant that we don't have a QB who has experience facing Tech's opponents and winning against them. This is compounded by a new OC and a new O. Normally, that takes a year or so to work out the kinks. I'm especially apprehensive about running a Ugag-style O with the OL we have coming back.Are you mistaking “no set QB” for ~hard choice between two good QB’s~?
Not trying to be rude but in case you didn’t know, there is one set as starter, Haynes King
I'm optimistic about what I see as improving personnel and coaching staff, but you're right to point out that experience of coaching staff and players (including our starting QB) working with each other and finding the same page to work on is bound to slow us down. On the cusp of a new season it's always the same with me - my natural optimism is tempered by the sour bells rung by the realists.No, I meant that we don't have a QB who has experience facing Tech's opponents and winning against them. This is compounded by a new OC and a new O. Normally, that takes a year or so to work out the kinks. I'm especially apprehensive about running a Ugag-style O with the OL we have coming back.
But, mainly, I meant that we don't have a proven QB to go on the field. King has starting experience and that's a plus. But he doesn't have starting experience at Tech or in the new O.
But maybe he'll turn out to be effective. We'll see soon enough.
Someday soon (against those 5) , we will be hoping to win 2 , play 2 others close, and get only get stomped by 1Perhaps too optimistic, but I hope to see 7-5.
Lose to Ole Miss--Clem--UNC---Miami---pups.
Hopefully not a Fantasy!
Pyron is really overrated by the crew here. He’s no better than a middling ACC starting QB, at least as a true freshman. Decently accurate, decent playmaking ability, dedicated heart (too dedicated sometimes as you saw when he picked up his injury).
The bad news is merely that we don't know (questions about a lot). We won't know until 2-3 weeks in whether it's bad news or good news. More, now that ever, the preseason polls will be meaningless. Too much movement from team to team is occurring to know who's going to be really good versus good versus average versus bad.The good news is that Key has got the team reconditioned to play good basic football I believe. The bad news is there are way too many losses of top players from last yr and questions about integration of new into this team right now--QB,DL,LBs and really STs probably - with OL always questionable.
So with no real killer injuries- 5 wins.