- Messages
- 3,092
Again with your critical analysis...LOL. We finished the season 17-4 having won 7 of 10, and we beat several of the top teams in the conference, finished fifth overall.That phrase doesn’t mean what you think it means. Let me try to explain in a different way.
A critical analysis is like having a Brazilian referee the USA vs. Mexico match. What people in here are doing is the equivalent of having that guy who paints uga on his head referee the Florida - Georgia game. The concerning portion is that you’re completely biased and can’t see it.
Is a national sportswriter who went to Ohio State biased for / against Tech? Probably not. Are you? Yes.
Is the NET/RPI I posted biased? Nope. Is your, “well shucks I watched games and we got hosed” biased? Yes.
If you are really using "critical analysis", you wouldn't just look at the record or whether we made the tournament. You would understand that Jose missed a large portion of the early season.
Our team sputtered without our leader, but when he came back, we were on a roll and playing very good basketball. You would know that if you had been watching the games.
Speaking of RPI, we finished the season 68th and didn't get a chance to make a tourney run. Getting a tourney bid would have been a tall task, but to act as if we underachieved is complete BS.
Especially when you consider that we had gone 15 years straight without a winning conference record. You're starting to sound like the guy who paints UGA on his head...
Not renewing his contract would have set GT basketball back for another 10 years, primarily because no coach worth a flip would even consider us.