CDS’s public assessments of Gapara genuinely has me doubting how impactful Ndongo is actually going to be when he’s healthy.So one early loss isn't the end of the world. Maybe we can straighten the ship out and maybe Terry and Baye returning will have big impacts.
With that being said, I still cannot for the life of me understand our starting line up and why we are starting Gapare and Abram. Last year we finished the year winning 6 of our last 9 against ACC teams. Yes, there were some bad teams in there but it was still a bit of momentum. We were scheduled to lose Franklin but return the rest. We fire Pastner, do a very short coaching search and bring in a new staff who basically cleans house. However, we did return 4 of our top 5 players from last year's team. But instead of leaning on that core, we have two of them coming off the bench in favor of players that simply have not proven they deserve to be starting. And while people will argue it doesn't matter who starts, it absolutely sets the tone for the team and the game who the starters are. The longer this trend happens the more it just looks like a new coach favoring players he brought in. That is the way you ferment chemistry issues.
You are correct. Our interior defense and our defensive rebounding effort have been sub-standard. We have had much roster turnover in that part of the team. I wouldn't be too judgmental yet but the effort appears to be lacking at this point. As I said earlier, it is a lack of confidence. Fixable.It appears that opponents are getting a lot of points in the paint. Am I wrong? Someone at the games? I mean blocking out and staying in front of your man is really relatively easy.
Maybe, but you’ve got to make it obvious in that situation.Not that we should rely on the refs to call the game but sturdy was fouled on his final drive. Not on the block but the guy on the back side swiped across his body and held his left arm keeping him from being able to jump so it was a pretty obvious foul. Yes we would have missed the free throws and yes he shouldn't be dribbling into 5 guys but it wasn't even borderline
Thought the play was for a Deebo 3 at the top of the key but I haven’t rewatched. It was covered but I honestly would have liked our odds more with his 3 contested or an ORB compared to a forced drive by Sturdy.Maybe, but you’ve got to make it obvious in that situation.
I honestly didn’t like the call to iso Kyle. It’s not really his strong suit. I’m surprised Kelly didn’t demand the ball at the end - even after the night he’d had. I feel like sending him to the rim gave us the best chance at a bucket or a foul. Instead we got a turnover.
Oh well - live and learn.
I’m assuming you meant above any other big man on offense?And I will echo some of the comments that CLAUDE is head shoulders and elbows above anybody else on offense but he is not a legit five on D
We have played two well-coached teams in a row.I’m not excusing how we played, but that team could ball.
It was if you watch CDS on the sideline pointing to Deebo with the clipboard signaling to Kyle he's right there, you can tell by CDS expression he was not happy with that play.Thought the play was for a Deebo 3 at the top of the key but I haven’t rewatched. It was covered but I honestly would have liked our odds more with his 3 contested or an ORB compared to a forced drive by Sturdy.
Yeah it was for Deebo, they doubled him, Sturdy panicked and drove with his head down instead of swinging it to Kelly. CDS pointed it out to him immediately after the play as Sturdy was walking to the bench.Thought the play was for a Deebo 3 at the top of the key but I haven’t rewatched. It was covered but I honestly would have liked our odds more with his 3 contested or an ORB compared to a forced drive by Sturdy.
So one early loss isn't the end of the world. Maybe we can straighten the ship out and maybe Terry and Baye returning will have big impacts.
With that being said, I still cannot for the life of me understand our starting line up and why we are starting Gapare and Abram. Last year we finished the year winning 6 of our last 9 against ACC teams. Yes, there were some bad teams in there but it was still a bit of momentum. We were scheduled to lose Franklin but return the rest. We fire Pastner, do a very short coaching search and bring in a new staff who basically cleans house. However, we did return 4 of our top 5 players from last year's team. But instead of leaning on that core, we have two of them coming off the bench in favor of players that simply have not proven they deserve to be starting. And while people will argue it doesn't matter who starts, it absolutely sets the tone for the team and the game who the starters are. The longer this trend happens the more it just looks like a new coach favoring players he brought in. That is the way you ferment chemistry issues.
Who's Lowell? Wasn't he one of the guys in Paper Chase? Not sure. Why keep scheduling patsies if you're going to lose to them?I hate to say it, but losing to UMass - Lowell tells me all I need to know about this coming season.
AgreeOn the positive side, Deebo has looked very good this year. He's in way better shape. Very active out there. Great game by him tonight.
Wow, that stat line reinforces what you see casually watching the game. Having Gapare and Abram on the floor at the same time is puzzling. You might as well fork yourself in the eye, it would be less painful. Maybe they get better in time, but right now they're shoudn't be on the floor together.One game sample, but the first 2 lines here are certainly striking.
View attachment 15129
As for Stoudamire’s strategy I don’t know. My guess was that he sees more upside with the group he’s starting and wants to develop them, but early returns don’t look good.
Sadly, my money is that you were dead on right. I will gladly eat crow if we are on the NCAA bubble....
Not that it matters but this is probably a Q4 loss when March rolls around. I don’t see us being in the discussion where that matters anyway.