Two no doubt amateurish ideas on our passing game

[CHE90]

I

WE SHOULDN'T BE USING A BACKS AS RECEIVERS IN PASSING SITUATIONS!!

I'm ok with it. Some of the best receivers we have had were A-backs.

Why not? I think Lynch is an outstanding receiver and so is Searcy. Both run quite well after the catch. I think Lands-Davis would be an excellent A-Back receiver (I know he's a WR this year). I think there are several other A-Backs that have excellent hands. Lining up Lynch, Searcy, Stewart and Jeune as 4-wide, you've got a potent quartet, with decent speed and good hands all around.

I think Searcy and Lynch are as good as any other receiver we have on the team.

I think Lynch was a receiver in high school and was converted to A-back at Tech and yes, he is as good a receiver as we have on the team.

 

[alentrekin]

I
I think Lynch was a receiver in high school and was converted to A-back at Tech and yes, he is as good a receiver as we have on the team.

Same with Searcy. Both were three star WRs in HS.

 

[Unk T]

Same with Searcy. Both were three star WRs in HS.

Lynch was actually given 2 stars coming out of high school....

 

[alentrekin]

Lynch was actually given 2 stars coming out of high school....

Ya, didn't check. Looks like he flipped from GaState.

If I could revise, I'd say we have competent receivers at AB and we should keep them on the field. I am sure CPJ would play guys who were better receivers if we had them ready.