To make us feel better…

bobongo

Helluva Engineer
Messages
7,739
Same here. And if we somehow win without sims playing, it would really be a miracle.
I'm guessing it would be the second biggest point spread upset for Tech since 1981 in Birmingham (the first being against Pitt this year).
That would be truly remarkable. Two 20+ point underdog wins in the same season. But FSU doesn't have the injuries on its DL that Pitt had. Chip Long's going to have to dig deep to find a way to move the ball against the Seminoles. And potentially without Sims as well. We'd be like Sisyphus, who twice cheated death. But you know what happened to him. Ended up in Hades, pushing the rock uphill for eternity...

 

MWBATL

Helluva Engineer
Messages
6,589
Red have you been smoking the formerly illegal stuff? You are accurate, however, GT has zero chance of winning the Coastal Division. Not based on mathematical chance, just watching us play. We are a BA team. No chance we can score enough points to beat teams with just average offenses. UNC actually has a good offense.
Honestly,. with Sims at 100% we are a decent offensive team (see: Pitt game) and would have a chance. Without him, you are completely correct.
 

Jim Prather

Helluva Engineer
Messages
1,043
I'm guessing it would be the second biggest point spread upset for Tech since 1981 in Birmingham (the first being against Pitt this year).
That would be truly remarkable. Two 20+ point underdog wins in the same season. But FSU doesn't have the injuries on its DL that Pitt had. Chip Long's going to have to dig deep to find a way to move the ball against the Seminoles. And potentially without Sims as well. We'd be like Sisyphus, who twice cheated death. But you know what happened to him. Ended up in Hades, pushing the rock uphill for eternity...

Has FSU gotten all their DL back? I was watching a game a couple of weeks ago, and the commentators were saying that FSU was down to 3rd string interior D-line due to injuries.
 

Techster

Helluva Engineer
Messages
18,390
Now, I think we will beat VPISU and get a lucky win against either Da U or UNCheat. The four wins by Key will have some people saying he showed enough improvement to warrant an offer, but not me. He blew his chance with that loss. You do not get 10 days to prepare and lay an egg like that and get a job offer.

I've been on the horn for Key as our HFC if he proved himself. IMO, 4 wins isn't enough to close the door on the coaching search and name him HFC. For me it was always going to be a 6-2 or better. GT has no realistic shot at beating UGA this year, and that would mean upsetting Pitt (check)/FSU/Miami/UNC as well as winning games we should Duke (check)/UVA (fail)/VT. Key could still go 6-2, but that loss to UVA at home really put him behind the 8 ball.

Now, if Key does go 6-2 and GT somehow ends up in the ACCCG (probable loss), makes and wins a bowl game...well, that would present a very interesting argument in his favor.
 

Northeast Stinger

Helluva Engineer
Messages
11,153
I've been on the horn for Key as our HFC if he proved himself. IMO, 4 wins isn't enough to close the door on the coaching search and name him HFC. For me it was always going to be a 6-2 or better. GT has no realistic shot at beating UGA this year, and that would mean upsetting Pitt (check)/FSU/Miami/UNC as well as winning games we should Duke (check)/UVA (fail)/VT. Key could still go 6-2, but that loss to UVA at home really put him behind the 8 ball.

Now, if Key does go 6-2 and GT somehow ends up in the ACCCG (probable loss), makes and wins a bowl game...well, that would present a very interesting argument in his favor.
Agree.

If Key is able to pull the team back together, regroup, and be competitive in our next game, that will be a good sign. If not, then the 6 win season probably will not happen and a new coach will be coming.
 

Heisman's Ghost

Helluva Engineer
Messages
4,938
Location
Albany Georgia
We are 3-4. Some of y’all picked us to be 1-6 right now.

3-4 is the same record as…
  • Miami, who started the season ranked in the top 15.
  • West Virginia
  • Iowa State
  • Nebraska, who puts a lot more money into football than we do.
  • Iowa, who’s QB may ACTUALLY be worse than Zach Gibson.
  • Michigan State, who started the year ranked 11.
  • Texas A&M, who started in the top TEN.
  • Auburn
  • Stanford (who beat ND)
  • Cal
  • and Arizona
and is better than…
  • Boston College
  • Virginia Tech
  • Northwestern (in an even year too)
  • NIU!!!!!!! (lol had to put em in here)
  • Colorado (our distant enemy from 1990)
  • and our crosstown friend Georgia State.
It could be worse! So while this season could be bad from here on out, we’re still on stable ground compared to other programs.
On the other hand, it is entirely conceivable that we have seen our last win and will finish yet again with 3 wins on the year. I predicted that we would win 4 and am holding to that. The ones that we share the exact same record with that are surprising, at least to me, are Miami, Nebraska, Michigan State, Texas A&M, and maybe Auburn. Miami fans are in a typical frenzy with some of them even claiming that would rather have Manny back. The moderators on this site seem to think that posters are difficult to please, argumentative, and sometimes borderline crazy. Tech fans are rank amateurs compared to Miami fans when it comes to complaining. Everyone, I mean everyone, players, coaches, cheerleaders, the AD, the band, the whole crowd is fair game.
 

Heisman's Ghost

Helluva Engineer
Messages
4,938
Location
Albany Georgia
I'm guessing it would be the second biggest point spread upset for Tech since 1981 in Birmingham (the first being against Pitt this year).
That would be truly remarkable. Two 20+ point underdog wins in the same season. But FSU doesn't have the injuries on its DL that Pitt had. Chip Long's going to have to dig deep to find a way to move the ball against the Seminoles. And potentially without Sims as well. We'd be like Sisyphus, who twice cheated death. But you know what happened to him. Ended up in Hades, pushing the rock uphill for eternity...

Are you saying then, that Tech's next coach is condemned to a "Sisyphean" task for what may seem an eternity of fruitless struggle with the Hill playing the part of the gods?
 

bke1984

Helluva Engineer
Messages
3,605
Honestly,. with Sims at 100% we are a decent offensive team (see: Pitt game) and would have a chance. Without him, you are completely correct.
I wouldn’t really call us decent with Sims. We just aren’t the worst offense in FBS when we have him. Probably bottom third.
 

bobongo

Helluva Engineer
Messages
7,739
Are you saying then, that Tech's next coach is condemned to a "Sisyphean" task for what may seem an eternity of fruitless struggle with the Hill playing the part of the gods?
I'm guess what I'm saying is, if Key (Sisyphus) rolls the rock uphill twice and ends up with the job, I hope it works out and we don't end up doomed in Hades. That having been said, I'm pulling for him.
 

g0lftime

Helluva Engineer
Messages
6,035
I've been on the horn for Key as our HFC if he proved himself. IMO, 4 wins isn't enough to close the door on the coaching search and name him HFC. For me it was always going to be a 6-2 or better. GT has no realistic shot at beating UGA this year, and that would mean upsetting Pitt (check)/FSU/Miami/UNC as well as winning games we should Duke (check)/UVA (fail)/VT. Key could still go 6-2, but that loss to UVA at home really put him behind the 8 ball.

Now, if Key does go 6-2 and GT somehow ends up in the ACCCG (probable loss), makes and wins a bowl game...well, that would present a very interesting argument in his favor.
Key is having to be HC with GC staff and players. He does not have an off season to hire his own staff and he must try to win with players from GC. He is hamstrung from the start. He probably will get a gig somewhere but at a lower level. Wrong place at the wrong time for him. CL has been a disappointment for me but the QB play has not been stellar either and Key has to own the OL performance.
 

swampsting

Helluva Engineer
Messages
1,881
I've felt better since the morning of Sept. 26. The main reason I didn't think we'd win more than two games was removed from the program.
 

CuseJacket

Administrator
Staff member
Messages
19,625
Honestly,. with Sims at 100% we are a decent offensive team (see: Pitt game) and would have a chance. Without him, you are completely correct.
Disagree, we are a little better at moving the ball when he is in, but still terrible at scoring touchdowns.
I wouldn’t really call us decent with Sims. We just aren’t the worst offense in FBS when we have him. Probably bottom third.
And, Sims was atrocious in the Pitt game. Whether you look at his PFF grade or saw him hit the Pitt LBs and DBs in the hands many times, the only takeaway is that was one of the worst games of his career, imo.

Total opposite vs. Duke, fwiw, but we've yet to see back-to-back solid games this year.
 
Top