bcaff
Jolly Good Fellow
- Messages
- 102
I took the total mpg for each player and extrapolated how many mpg each player is playing at each position. I had to make some assumptions that probably aren't 100% accurate, but I think still shows the basic idea.
I'm surprised so far that JH has played so much. I know TJ isn't 100%, but I would have expected CH to take more of the workload. I've been pleasantly surprised by JH's play.
I like MGH playing significant minutes at the 2. It allows us to play bigger and put our best 5 players on the court. SF is the more natural position for QS. It's not surprising that MGH is playing the most, but I wouldn't have expected before the season started that QS would be second on the team. This is probably a result of QS playing so well and only having two players who can really play at SF.
Some assumptions:
SG needed 0.3 mpg from PG, so I assumed JH is probably the most likely out of TJ and CH to play some minutes at the 2
I have Charles Mitchell as the only PF to play at C. RS and AG could have some minutes there, but I'm not sure how it'd all add up
I'm surprised so far that JH has played so much. I know TJ isn't 100%, but I would have expected CH to take more of the workload. I've been pleasantly surprised by JH's play.
I like MGH playing significant minutes at the 2. It allows us to play bigger and put our best 5 players on the court. SF is the more natural position for QS. It's not surprising that MGH is playing the most, but I wouldn't have expected before the season started that QS would be second on the team. This is probably a result of QS playing so well and only having two players who can really play at SF.
Some assumptions:
SG needed 0.3 mpg from PG, so I assumed JH is probably the most likely out of TJ and CH to play some minutes at the 2
I have Charles Mitchell as the only PF to play at C. RS and AG could have some minutes there, but I'm not sure how it'd all add up