- Messages
- 19,627
Yep. Definitely need a new video of the back half this play.
/
Yep. Definitely need a new video of the back half this play.
/
On the midline qb follow to right is the play designed to go inside or outside of the right tackle (79)???
On this play the defensive end (4) pushes our rt into the middle so far the play goes outside of them both!!!
Is this the way the rt blocking is planned for this play?
Not a chop block, but would be called a chop block. The NG engaged the center, the center never engaged the NG, only tried to move past him to get to the MLB. The LG tried to cut. This is going to get called more often than not, but the refs are also being trained by CPJ to recognize when the DL engages the center and when the center is trying to avoid contact. If the center is trying to avoid engagement, it's not a chop block.I hate to say it, but there was a chop block on the C and LG.
The irony is that if the Nose had simply let Coop pass, he'd have been in perfect position to tackle MJ.Not a chop block, but would be called a chop block. The NG engaged the center, the center never engaged the NG, only tried to move past him to get to the MLB. The LG tried to cut. This is going to get called more often than not, but the refs are also being trained by CPJ to recognize when the DL engages the center and when the center is trying to avoid contact. If the center is trying to avoid engagement, it's not a chop block.
#6 went with the motion AB while the play side safety crashed down with his assignment AB.
Agree!The irony is that if the Nose had simply let Coop pass, he'd have been in perfect position to tackle MJ.
Lynch was his(#6) assignment. Remember, this is "assignment football". Sure he had tunnel vision, as he had probably been drilled all week.Yes, and the MLB overcommitted to the outside. #6 way overplayed to the outside. Playside safety probably played his assignment as coached. IMO #6 way too concerned with Lynch. He was unblocked and should have made the tackle.